"Andre W B Furtado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is is possible to declare a generic type without using "data" or "newtype"?
> For example, I woud like that "pair" is a type synonym for "(t,t)" where t
> is a generic type, but just saying:
>
> > type pair = (t,t)
>
> won't work: i get a parse
Is is possible to declare a generic type without using "data" or "newtype"?
For example, I woud like that "pair" is a type synonym for "(t,t)" where t
is a generic type, but just saying:
> type pair = (t,t)
won't work: i get a parse error.
Thanks,
-- Andre
_
