Everyone now acknowledges that Haskell's modules are the weakest part
of the language, and people are working on ways to fix that (yes,
someday I hope there will be a Haskell 2).
Are any details available as to what directions this work is taking?
I'm aware of of some work to extend
At the risk of opening old wounds: why weren't ML/FX style modules
included in Haskell? I can think of a number of possible reasons, but
I'm interested in the "official" reason for leaving out such an
important feature.
Other committee members may have different recollections, but
At the risk of opening old wounds: why weren't ML/FX style modules
included in Haskell? I can think of a number of possible reasons, but
I'm interested in the "official" reason for leaving out such an
important feature.
bevan
