Warren writes:
> In light of Simon's
> proposal, the "(sic)" proposal should now be seen as a source of examples,
> rather than a still viable proposal.
As Simon notes, neither extended guards nor views subsumes the other.
Views are as viable as they ever were.
Roughly speaking, extended guards
A couple of people have asked about:
[2] W Burton, E Meijer, P Sansom, S Thompson, P Wadler, "A (sic) extension
to Haskell 1.3 for views", sent to the Haskell mailing list
23 Oct 1996
I am enclosing a copy of the "(sic)" proposal below. In light of Simon's
proposal, the "(sic)"
MPC '98
Fourth International Conference on
MATHEMATICS OF PROGRAM CONSTRUCTION
---
http://www.md.chalmers.se/Conf/MPC98/
June 15 - 17, 1998
Mars
Just wanted to add two minor points to the discussion. Beforehand let
me say that I *really* like Simon's proposal [despite the various
objections]. Mainly, because it's a small upwards compatible change with
a considerable gain.
Going back to Simon's first `clunky' example.
> Now consider the f
