I also like the approach of generalizing the record system, although I
have not evaluated your particular proposal. Speaking of record
improvements why is
http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~mpj/pubs/lightrec.html
not listed on the future of haskell page? has it already been determined
to not be in t
>Who are the audience for the books on Advanced Functional Programming?
>Academics with a theoretical CS background or someone with just a bit of
>understanding of FP? Ideally, I would like a course suited for someone who
>has completed a basic FP course.
It varies a bit per school (book) and pe
Benjamin L. Russell wrote (on 28-12-00 17:35 -0500):
> > >> "Furuike ya! Kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto." --Matsuo Basho
> > [..] Is it OK if I show off and steal some thunder? :)
So much for that idea...!
> > "(It's) An old pond! The sound of water steadily dripping in..."
>
> Actually, if I
1. Is the lack of dynamic binding of functions by design or because it was
too much effort to be justified at the time the language was designed? In
object oriented programming there can be several implementations of the same
interface, and they can be stored in the same collection.
2. It
On 12/28/2000 at 7:00 PM Bill Halchin wrote:
>Hello IR,
>I agree with the OU Haskell Tutorial. It is excellent!!
Yes, with a bit of editing and more diagrams , it would probably be worth publishing.
>BTW, what is your C# source?
The .NET Framework SDK is freely downloadable from MS ( around
On 29-Dec-2000, Doug Ransom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Is the lack of dynamic binding of functions by design or because it was
> too much effort to be justified at the time the language was designed? In
> object oriented programming there can be several implementations of the same
> interfa
