Re: [Haskell] Eternal Compatibility In Theory

robert dockins wrote: >>> Is there a way to reliably and automatically check if two versions of >>> a haskell module are interface compatible? >> >> >> No, because it would have to check whether the semantics of functions >> is the same, even if they are written differently. > > > Of course, we

[Haskell] announce: wxHaskell 0.9.4

Announcement: wxHaskell version 0.9.4 -- I am pleased to announce a new release of wxHaskell. This is mostly an update to support GHC 6.4 and it does not contain any new features. Binary installer

[Haskell] FroCoS 2005: Final cfp - extended submission deadline: May 16, 2005

[Apologies for multiple copies] FroCoS 2005: FINAL CALL FOR PAPERS *** SUBMISSION DEADLINE (EXTENDED): May 16, 2005 *** ---

[Haskell] Proposal: Relative Module Imports

Problem: We need a way to simplify module imports. Problem details: * Hierarchical module names are getting really long (including a functional area, a package name, and a module name). * People typically import multiple modules from areas close to each other in the hierarchical module namespace

[Haskell] Re: Proposal: Relative Module Imports

On 5/3/05, S. Alexander Jacobson alexjacobson.com> wrote: > Problem: We need a way to simplify module imports. > > Problem details: > > * Hierarchical module names are getting really long (including a > functional area, a package name, and a module name). > > * People typically import multiple mod