Frederik Eaton wrote:
> main = do
> let a = (map (\x->
> x+1) --*
> [0..9]) --*
> print a
seeing this, I wonder if do-statements (and qualifiers in list
comprehensions) could be easily extended by an alternative for simple
declarations (without mutual recursion and type sig
Dear all,
I am writing a long string (several MByte) to a file,
with writeFile fname ( render d )
where d :: Text.PrettyPrint.HughesPJ.Doc
I wonder what happens internally
(when compiled with ghc -O, if that matters)
Will the string be in memory completely
before it is actually written?
My d
Hi,
maybe try using fullRender with defaults (mode=PageMode, lineLength=100,
ribbonsPerLine=1.5) and "a" instantiated to "IO()" so that TextDetails
can be appended to a file (handle).
HTH Christian
Johannes Waldmann wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am writing a long string (several MByte) to a file,
>
At 12:02 PM 7/12/2005, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Montag, 11. Juli 2005 15:51 schrieben Sie:
> [...]
> I am always interested in functional I/O solutions that adopt the
> "world-as-value" paradigm (or the more verbose "explicit multiple
> environment passing" paradigm) that has been exploited in
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2005 13:17 schrieben Sie:
> [...]
> > > where readEntireFile reads the entire file and returns it as a string.
> > > I can imagine several results: [a,a], [a,b], [a,_|_], [_|_,_|_], _|_.
> >
> >I decided to distinguish between read-only I/O and write-permitted I/O.
> > If
On 14 July 2005 10:08, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
> I am writing a long string (several MByte) to a file,
> with writeFile fname ( render d )
> where d :: Text.PrettyPrint.HughesPJ.Doc
>
> I wonder what happens internally
> (when compiled with ghc -O, if that matters)
> Will the string be in memo
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:15:32AM +0200, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
> The offside rule is patronizing. :)
> It tries to force you to lay out your program in a certain way.
> If you like that way, good.
I disagree. The offside rule in general makes a more concise syntax
available to the programmer
On 7/14/05, Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:15:32AM +0200, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
> > The offside rule is patronizing. :)
> > It tries to force you to lay out your program in a certain way.
> > If you like that way, good.
>
> I disagree. The offside rule i
