--- Blind-Carbon-Copy
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: mbanda
Subject: TPLP special issue call for papers
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:09:40 +1100
From: Maria Garcia de la Banda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Apologies for multiple cop
Isaac Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, does cpphs do anything with ghcconfig.h? Should cabal be adding
> that include path somewhere in the cases where it uses cpphs?
cpphs has no pre-defined macros, and no predefined include paths.
If you want it to pretend to be ghc -cpp, you need to a
On Dec 5, 2005, at 10:31 PM, Isaac Jones wrote:
"Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:18 AM, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 22:48 -0500, Robert Dockins wrote:
I've just run across a problem with my cabal build system -- I'm
not yet sure
if this is a cabal
I'ts semi-public. Its avaliable, but I don't consider it ready for
alpha release so its not been announced. You can find it at
http://www.eecs.tufts.edu/~rdocki0/cmm
So I guess its announced now :)
G URL typo, sorry. Try:
http://www.eecs.tufts.edu/~rdocki01/cmm
Hi all,
I have some program data that I'd like to persist. I could just
use read and show and file I/O to store arrays as files. [1] This
works and it is easy and simple (which I like) but it is also
inefficient and a little cumbersome.
I imagine that this is a very common task, and
I usually use the the Binary class, found in NewBinary for this task.
You derive Binary for each type you wish to serialise, which gives you a
get and put function on handles. A stripped down version suitable for
many tasks lives here:
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/code/hmp3/Binary.hs
This
"Matthew M. Munz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I have some program data that I'd like to persist. I could just use read
> and show and file I/O to store arrays as files. [1] This works and it is easy
> and simple (which I like) but it is also inefficient and a little cumbersome.
I like SerTH
>> > instance CpsForm t t where
>> This can't be right, can it?
> In general no: the CPS of a function certainly doesn't fit the above
> pattern. So, if the source language has abstractions (the language in
> the original message didn't), we have to add another instance for
> CpsForm.
But any othe
