Re: [Haskell] Nested guards?

2007-12-06 Thread Roel van Dijk
Note that Clean also supports nested guards. See section 3.3 of the Clean language report: http://clean.cs.ru.nl/download/Clean20/doc/CleanRep2.0.pdf Unfortunately the html version of the report appears to be broken. The report gives an example of nested guards and explains the semantics with "i

RE: [Haskell] Nested guards?

2007-12-06 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| Note that Clean also supports nested guards. See section 3.3 of the | Clean language report: | | http://clean.cs.ru.nl/download/Clean20/doc/CleanRep2.0.pdf Interesting, I didn't know that. But (a) Clean guards don't bind, and pattern guards that bind was where this thread started. And (b) th

Re: [Haskell] Nested guards?

2007-12-06 Thread Bas van Dijk
On Dec 6, 2007 9:06 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > b) the Clean manual says: "To ensure that at least one of the alternatives of > a nested guard will be successful, a nested guarded alternative > must always > have a 'default case' as last alternative". That's a pity. The

[Haskell] [Fwd: PADL'08: Call for Participation (Early Reg. Deadline: Dec 13)]

2007-12-06 Thread Paul Hudak
___ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

[Haskell] Re: PADL'08: Call for Participation (Early Reg. Deadline: Dec 13)

2007-12-06 Thread Paul Hudak
CALL FOR PARTICIPATION!!! Tenth International Symposium on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages 2008 (PADL '08) http://www.ist.unomaha.edu/padl2008/ San Fra