Ian Holyer writes:
The current restriction that instances must be defined either in
the class module or the type module is painful.
LISTEN TO THIS MAN! Trying to use the module system in (what we
imagined to be) a sensible way on the Glasgow Haskell compiler [which
is written in Haske
Here is another suggestion for Haskell 1.3.
The current restriction that instances must be defined either in the class
module or the type module is painful. If a module defining an abstract type
contains a class definition, it may be impossible to define an instance in the
module defining the t
In diku.lists.haskell you write:
>How badly would you miss ~ ?
Not at all. I have never used it.
>How badly would you be hit by the
>restriction on `let' and `where'?
Very little.
Torben Mogensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
