> > With present Haskell modules, it seems that `with'
> > automatically comes with `use' and clutters up your namespace.
> > That's why you sometimes need re-naming when importing.
Sorry, I missed that one. Manuel pointed out that with/use
is already contained in the `qualified names'-proposal.
When I'm comparing Haskell to Ada, it seems that basically
import Foo = with Foo; use Foo;
import qualified Foo = with Foo;
Still I'd like to have Ada's `use' on its own, as in
with Text_Io;
package Foo is
...
procedure Bar is
use Text_Io;
begin
...
end;
...
end Foo;
And while we're at it, what about
- nested modules
- with possibly private sub-modules
similar to the Ada(-95) things.
--
Johannes Waldmann, Institut f\"ur Informatik, UHH, Jena, D-07740 Germany,
(03641) 630793 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.minet.uni-
jena.de/~joe/ ... Im naechsten Heft: Als Arbeiter in einer Radiofabrik -
Freundschaft mit dem Sohn eines Luftwaffengenerals - Das KGB ueberwacht
den Amerikaner auf Schritt und Tritt - Alarmierende Verdachtsmomente bei
der Kaninchenjagd - Ungluecklich verliebt in eine rothaarige Juedin
