On 09-Aug-1998, Erik Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> >The Haskell Server page claims that one advantage of COM is that it
> >"ships for free with windows". This suggests that the existence of a
> >genuinely free CORBA ORB has been overlooked.
> >
> >IMHO ignoring CORBA is cutting
> I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
> H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
> means that they are rather useless to me.
>
Lets clarify some points:
- H/Direct is a OSF DCE IDL compiler which can not only
generate COM specific bindings but also for example
From: Timothy Robin BARBOUR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > "Sigbjorn" == Sigbjorn Finne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sigbjorn> As part of H/Direct, we're going to support something
> Sigbjorn> similar to JNI for the new Hugs/GHC system, see
>
> Sigbjorn>http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/
Lennart Augustsson writes:
>
> > I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
> > H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
> > means that they are rather useless to me.
> I agree!
>
Mud sticks, so may I suggest you actually take the time to read the
available docs b
> I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
> H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
> means that they are rather useless to me.
I agree!
-- Lennart
"Jeffrey R. Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought the if-the-else proposal seemed odd until I followed the link
> and read the exact proposal. Simon: your if-then-else example on the
> Standard Haskell page seems at odds with the actual proposal (e.g. isn't
> the point that the `else' i
Manuel M. T. Chakravarty writes:
>
..
>
> I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
> H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
> means that they are rather useless to me.
>
Sigh, it's not *based* on proprietary standards - whatever gave you
that idea? The IDL com