Working on a Linux Redhat 5.0 machine, running version 3.02 patchlevel
0, I have run across two problems:
1) A program that seems correct (at least, it compiles and runs under
Hugs) dies with a segmentation fault and dumps core.
2) Somehow, programs cannot find the Posix library. I am not
Sigbjorn writes:
Looks bad, could you tarzip the program up so that we can have a look
at it?
On the way to you, under separate cover (why burden the list?).
I don't know what might be causing this, could you provide the output
of compiling one such module with -v?
Found it (why
David Barton writes:
Working on a Linux Redhat 5.0 machine, running version 3.02 patchlevel
0, I have run across two problems:
1) A program that seems correct (at least, it compiles and runs under
Hugs) dies with a segmentation fault and dumps core.
Looks bad, could you tarzip the
Yes, I think it's a fine idea to loosen up the syntax and allow import and
infix anywhere. But could someone clarify what the intent is with regards to
the scoping of liberally sprinkled imports/infixes?
I've added a clarification; my intent was that all ttimport/tt and tt
fixity/tt
