seems to be generating incomplete C code:
~~~
ghc-4.00 -c -cpp -syslib misc -fglasgow-exts -H27M
-DAFMPATH=\\\"/usr/local/tex/Adobe\\\" -DRGBPATH=\\\"/usr/lib/X11\\\"
CommandLine.hs -o CommandLine.o
/usr/libexec/ld.so: warning:
On 12-Nov-1998, Lennart Augustsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] if you dislike tuples you can use nested pairs
At the cost of losing a little type-safety.
--
Fergus Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Binaries may die
WWW: http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh | but source code lives forever"
PGP:
On 12-Nov-1998, D. Tweed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 1998, Fergus Henderson wrote:
It would
avoid the nastiness of a special definition for each tuple type and and
lead to more flexibility.
I want each tuple arity to be a different type, so that I get a compile
error
We're nearly done with Haskell 98.
* In my last progress report I said:
However a couple of other similar proposals have been made
- add succ and pred to class Enum
- add atan2 to class RealFloat
I've had no complaints so I consider this done.
* Still no decision about the
Now that Javasoft is on the verge of releasing the jdk1.2, I figure that
it is time to try to call Java from Haskell again.
Java would provide Haskell with
* JDBC database access (standard database access on platforms other than windows)
* HTTP client and server libs
* JavaSpaces linda style
At 10:40 -0800 1998/11/13, Jeffrey R. Lewis wrote:
Say you've got some code that wasn't originally
monadic, and you now need to re-express your code in monadic form. You
apply the monad translation. Using the `kleisli' functions makes this
process simpler. Consider:
map f (... xs ...)
At 05:53 -0800 1998/11/13, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
* Still no decision about the default default. I'm minded to
try out the change myself and see how many times it's used
in the nofib suite. I think the main choices are
(Int, Double)
(Integer, Double)
I
Hans Aberg wrote:
At 10:40 -0800 1998/11/13, Jeffrey R. Lewis wrote:
Say you've got some code that wasn't originally
monadic, and you now need to re-express your code in monadic form. You
apply the monad translation. Using the `kleisli' functions makes this
process simpler. Consider:
Could someone give me a reference on transcendental types (and how
algebraic+transcendental types are related to algebraic an
transcendental numbers, if they are)? I'd appreciate it.
--
__
/ David Feuer \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| [EMAIL
Just want to say I think that GUI interaction does _not_ belong in a
Haskell standard. Different GUIs act differently altogether. e.g., try
coming up with a standard to fit X, Berlin, Oberon, and Windows NT.
At 16:58 + 1998/11/11, Mark P Jones wrote:
A new *beta* version of Hugs is available ... Hugs-98...
I made a MacPPC binary (sorry, none I know of has built it for Mac 68k),
which might become available somewhere at
ftp://haskell.org/pub/haskell/hugs/
if the administrator of that site
My interpretation of the last set of mailings on the issue was that people
had given up. Obviously that was incorrect.
I would love to alpha test your Hakell2Java code.
I browsed through the Opal docs and could not find the relevant
documentation on a Java interface. Can you provide a more
I would like to point out that on Solaris there are 2 SUN JDK releases:
so-called reference (put out by Javasoft) and production (by SunSoft). The
latter has had native threads for a while. Certainly they are here in 1.6 and
1.7. I don't know what is the situation on Windows, though.
-- O.L.
13 matches
Mail list logo
