Re: Object Splitting and the Base Package Makefile

* Wolfgang Thaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-09T00:42+0200]: When building the library archive libHSbase.a, the makefile system includes not only all the split object files, but also the file PrimopWrappers.o. Consequently [at least on Mac OS X], ranlib generates a warning about duplicate

[ ghc-Bugs-617082 ] ghc -O generates faulty c code

Bugs item #617082, was opened at 2002-10-01 15:47 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=617082group_id=8032 Category: Compiler Group: 5.04 Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to:

[ ghc-Bugs-620264 ] rdrNameModule it

Bugs item #620264, was opened at 2002-10-08 14:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=620264group_id=8032 Category: Compiler Group: 5.04.1 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to:

RE: ghc MacOS X 10.2 behaviour

[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be a better bet. Wolfgang Thaller is Supreme Being for MacOS so I'm cc'ing him too. | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: 14 October 2002 14:44 | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: ghc MacOS X 10.2 behaviour | | Hi all,

RE: [GHCi 5.04.1] the `impossible' happened

[Indented text is me; unindented text is GHCi] Initial experience with the bug: *Autoexi let x e = do putStrLn hmm...; return 'c' *Autoexi y - catch (getChar) (x) here, I hit ^C several times, hoping to catch that as an exception. This didn't seem to happen, and GHCi appeared

Re: ghc MacOS X 10.2 behaviour

Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be a better bet. Wolfgang Thaller is Supreme Being for MacOS so I'm cc'ing him too. Oh, I like that title! | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: 14 October 2002 14:44 | To: [EMAIL

RE: -package-name

| Aha. So how will GHC find all the various module imports? You install the package using ghc-pkg. That tells GHC where it is. For more information on the interaction between hierarchical libraries and the package mechanism, see

RE: IO security

I'm looking for secure compile and run-time methods to ensure automatically that Haskell modules cannot perform particular IO operations. Therefore, I've got some questions that might be interesting for other people using GHC as well. o There are functions like unsafePerformIO. How

Q: Bug? 'Storable' and 'with'

Hi, I am using ghc-5.04 and a code like: with c ( \c' - hPutBuf h c' (sizeOf c)) fails with Fail: Prelude.undefined when c is a user defined type, such as a pair: instance (Storable at,Storable bt) = Storable (at,bt) where sizeOf (a,b) = sizeOf a + sizeOf b alignment

ghc MacOS X 10.2 behaviour

Hi all, I'm working with Haskell on MacOS X 10.2.1 using the binaries from www.uni-graz.at/imawww/haskell. Now, when I compile some code with ghc I get two errors: /tmp/ghc617.hc:283: conflicting types for 'GHCziTopHandler_runIO_closure' and /usr/local/lib/ghc-5.04/include/RtsAPI.h:125:

RE: Bug? 'Storable' and 'with'

I am using ghc-5.04 and a code like: with c ( \c' - hPutBuf h c' (sizeOf c)) fails with Fail: Prelude.undefined when c is a user defined type, such as a pair: instance (Storable at,Storable bt) = Storable (at,bt) where sizeOf (a,b) = sizeOf a + sizeOf b

Re: efficiency of mfix

Hi again, all. So I rewrote some of the versions, so there are now six versions of the array normalization code. They are: normal: combination of foldM and mapM_ loop: a two-pass loop mimicking foldM and mapM_ unboxed-normal: normal on unboxed arrays unboxed-loop: loop on

Re: efficiency of mfix

On Monday 14 October 2002 09:25 am, you wrote: While I'm happy that the fix versions outperform the 2-pass versions for boxed arrays, the discrepency between 79.16 seconds for one million elements and 4.54 sectons on the same data is alarming. Can anyone suggest a way to reconcile this? As