[ ghc-Bugs-710805 ] compile windows program

2003-03-27 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710805, was opened at 2003-03-27 08:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=710805group_id=8032 Category: Compiler Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to:

[ ghc-Bugs-710805 ] compile windows program

2003-03-27 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710805, was opened at 2003-03-27 08:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=710805group_id=8032 Category: Compiler Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to:

[ ghc-Bugs-710805 ] compile windows program

2003-03-27 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710805, was opened at 2003-03-27 08:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=710805group_id=8032 Category: Compiler Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to:

[ ghc-Bugs-710864 ] entries field is often 0

2003-03-27 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710864, was opened at 2003-03-27 09:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=710864group_id=8032 Category: Profiling Group: 5.04.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to:

Performance Timing

2003-03-27 Thread Spencer Janssen
I've written two versions of a prime number sieve, and I'm trying to figure out how to performance test them. I've found functions to get the current date and time, and to subtract them, but when I put them in a do notation, I guess the laziness or something, makes the calculation happen

CFP: JFP Special Issue on Parallel Functional Programming

2003-03-27 Thread Phil Trinder
Journal of Functional Programming Special Issue on Functional Approaches to High-Performance Parallel Programming Guest editor: Phil Trinder Submission deadine: 26th September 2003 Web Page: http://www.cee.hw.ac.uk/~trinder/jfpCFP.htm High-performance parallel programs are hard to write.

Re: Performance Timing

2003-03-27 Thread Hal Daume III
This is in part an answer, in part a question. If 'b' is a simple value, then somethign like: timer f a = do t1 - get current time t2 - f a `seq` get current time return (different in t2 and t1) (my memory of Time fails right now, so fill in the proper functions.) perhaps safer is to use

RE: Performance Timing

2003-03-27 Thread Simon Marlow
timer f a = do t1 - get current time evaluate (f a) t2 - get current time return (different in t2 and t1) where evaluate is from Control.Exception. could someone tell me how evaluate compares to seq and deepSeq? The documentation explains the difference, but it's a bit cryptic.

how to use POSIX function utime?

2003-03-27 Thread David Roundy
I'm trying to figure out how to use the POSIX function utime. I'm pretty much stumped at the moment, largely because I can't figure out how to do anything useful with ClockTime variables. I can't see any way to make use of GHC.Posix.utime, as it gives a binding to the utime function, but the