On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 08:23 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
The problem is caused by InteractiveUI.hs. It suppresses the
prompt when ghci's stdin is
not a tty (is_tty is false). Is there ever a reason to do
this? emacs needs the prompt to determine
when ghci's output has ended. If it never
What is going on here? Is it already fixed in 6.1?
# uname -a
Linux denebola 2.4.19-4GB #2 Mon Mar 31 10:57:24 CEST 2003 i686 unknown
# ghc DynExcep.hs -c -fglasgow-exts
# ghci
___ ___ _
/ _ \ /\ /\/ __(_)
/ /_\// /_/ / / | | GHC Interactive, version 6.0, for Haskell 98.
/
BARRISTER DOMINIC OSHOMA CO.
FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION:
RE: REQUEST FOR MUTUALLY BENEFITTING ENDEAVOUR.
I humbly crave your indulgence in sending you this mail, if the contents does not meet
with your personal and business ethics, I appologise in advance.
I am barrister Dominic Oshoma (
running ghci with -prof turned on makes it die immediately (with an
appropriate message about this combination being illegal). however, i
find that i would almost always *rather* run ghci with -prof turned on
than without it. i don't particularly want to create profiles, but i'd
really like
Good Day Friend,
With warm heart I offer my friendship, and my greetings, and I hope
this letter meets you in good time. It will be surprising to you to
receive this proposal from me since you do not know me personally.
However, I am sincerely seeking your confidence in this transaction,
which I
running ghci with -prof turned on makes it die immediately (with an
appropriate message about this combination being illegal). however, i
find that i would almost always *rather* run ghci with -prof turned on
than without it. i don't particularly want to create
profiles, but i'd
really
Content violation found in email message.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Details
Matching Subject: re: details
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I am interested in interval arithmetic.
Does anyone know something about haskell implementations in this domain?
It would be nice to have a datatype Interval with the elementary
operations {+,-,*,/}, where
+ :: Intervall - Intervall - Intervall
(a,b) + (c,d) = (a+c,b+d)
- :: Intervall
Hello,
I have a question about pattern-matching. In the Haskell-report it is
not postulated, that
pattern matching has to be exhaustive. Would it be possible at all to
implement an
algorithm, which checks Haskell-style patterns for exhaustiveness? What
kinds of
complication can be expected?
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:08:32 +0100
Rajiv Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.a conditional expression
This one uses case so it should solve your homework; moreover it uses
an orthogonal matrix (as long as you pay attention to the value assigned
to f, of course) so it is safe.
cut here
I have a question about pattern-matching. In the Haskell-report it is
not postulated, that
pattern matching has to be exhaustive. Would it be possible at all to
implement an
algorithm, which checks Haskell-style patterns for
exhaustiveness? What
kinds of
complication can be expected?
hello,
Steffen Mazanek wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about pattern-matching. In the Haskell-report it is
not postulated, that
pattern matching has to be exhaustive. Would it be possible at all to
implement an
algorithm, which checks Haskell-style patterns for exhaustiveness? What
kinds of
What is Nick Name doing? Trolling?
I don't approve of people getting homework done on this emailing
list, you learn more from doing, but baiting newbies is worse.
You want to give them the idea that Haskell is complex and abtruse?
I need to define a function called safetail; it's like tail
There's a small problem with this solution, namely that it requires you
to have an Eq instance for the elements in the list. You can fix this
by using 'null' from the Prelude.
--
Hal Daume III | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arrest this man, he talks in maths.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:58:20 -0700
John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 02:00:32PM +0200, Per Larsson wrote:
I have problems finding a pleasing indentation style for haskell
code. Especially nested do-blocks have a tendency to run away to the
right margin. When
Hello,
I have been trying to install ghc on my redhat 7.3 system. I have
about a 1.2 ghz processor. I got ghc-5.04.2 installed from an rpm. The
./configure for ghc-6.0.1 seemed to work fine. When I ran make it went
for about an hour and a half, at which time it seemed to have been
hung up for
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:41:45AM -0500, Mark Espinoza wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to install ghc on my redhat 7.3 system. I have
about a 1.2 ghz processor. I got ghc-5.04.2 installed from an rpm. The
./configure for ghc-6.0.1 seemed to work fine. When I ran make it went
for about
Just my 2 cents...
The first is that I always put the where for local function
definitions
on a new line, e.g.
foo x = x + a + b
where a = 1 + x
b = 2 * x
I find this a lot clearer and prettier than,
foo x = x + a + b where
a = 1 + x
b = 2 * x
I used to do it
Title: Prefix and postfix operators
Hello,
Are there any plans to extend Haskell parser to support prefix and postfix operators? It will be just great for domain-specific languages. It always kind of bothered me that unary minus is special.
Thanks,
Eugene
Hi.
I'm curious about what the people on this list consider appropriate,
as responses to homework questions. Even if there isn't a consensus,
it may be interesting to see how opinion is divided.
Please consider the following.
(A) Give a perfect answer.
(B) Give a subtly flawed answer.
(C) Give
Tom Pledger wrote:
I'm curious about what the people on this list consider appropriate,
as responses to homework questions. Even if there isn't a consensus,
it may be interesting to see how opinion is divided.
Please consider the following.
(A) Give a perfect answer.
(B) Give a subtly
21 matches
Mail list logo
