I have a bug, here's the error from the compiler.
ghc -fglasgow-exts -o build/Graphics/UI/GIO/Bitmap.o -package-name gio
-ohi build/Graphics/UI/GIO/Bitmap.hi -odir build/Graphics/UI/GIO -c
src/Graphics/UI/GIO/Bitmap.hs -package port -O2 -ibuild
ghc-6.0.1: panic! (the `impossible' happened, GHC
From: Hadjiya Mariam Abacha
plot 234 ruston drive Ikoyi
Lagos- Nigeria.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Sir,
Following the sudden death of my husband General Sani Abacha the late former head of
state of Nigeria in june 1998, I have been thrown into a state of utter confussion,
frustration and
From: Hadjiya Mariam Abacha
plot 234 ruston drive Ikoyi
Lagos- Nigeria.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Sir,
Following the sudden death of my husband General Sani Abacha the late former head of
state of Nigeria in june 1998, I have been thrown into a state of utter confussion,
frustration and
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:18:43PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Am I right in thinking that by just putting
GhcUnregisterised=YES
SplitObjs=NO
in mk/build.mk every time you build GHC it ought to not only work on
arches with bit-rotted mangler support but also those with none
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but is there a make target,
which I can use to install all documentation that comes with the
build? I am aware of make install-docs, but this doesn't build nor
install, say, the user's guide. Nor does it install documentation for
Alex or Happy, even though I'm
Hi,
I notice that the readline package is missing from the Windows MSI build
of GHC 6.0.1. Is this deliberate and/or a fundamental limitation of the
Windows platform? Would I have to/be able to make my own Cygwin-based
build to get it?
Cheers,
Ganesh
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 06:27:03PM +0200, Peter Simons wrote:
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but is there a make target,
which I can use to install all documentation that comes with the
build? I am aware of make install-docs, but this doesn't build nor
install, say, the user's guide.
DATE: 17th Sept.2003
FROM: THE DESK OF THE VICE PRESIDENT.
INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE AWARD..
BATCH: EGS/ 22504002/03: REFERENCE: 15/0018/IPD
E-MAIL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAX:34+916470023.
ATTENTION: DEAR SIR/MADAM.
RE: AWARD NOTIFICATION.
This is to inform you of the release of the EL-GORDO
DATE: 17th Sept.2003
FROM: THE DESK OF THE VICE PRESIDENT.
INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE AWARD..
BATCH: EGS/ 22504002/03: REFERENCE: 15/0018/IPD
E-MAIL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAX:34+916470023.
ATTENTION: DEAR SIR/MADAM.
RE: AWARD NOTIFICATION.
This is to inform you of the release of the EL-GORDO
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 05:14:36PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
alpha:
--- ghc6-6.0.1.orig/ghc/includes/Stg.h
+++ ghc6-6.0.1/ghc/includes/Stg.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
# endif
#endif
+#include TailCalls.h
+
/* Configuration */
#include config.h
Ooops, TailCalls.h wants to be below
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Derek Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think this type is an arrow. For a product arrow, i.e. an
instance of Hughes' Arrow class with first defined, you can define
this:
Oh, it's definitely an arrow.
I don't think you can make it an instance of
I agree with this. We'll move GHC to implement any consensus.
My own opinion is that
expr :: = ... | do { stmts }
stmts :: = .. | rec { stmts }
is the cleanest story. I guess that we should ensure that
do rec { stmts }
means what it looks like.
Simon
| -Original
Is there a spreadsheet written in Haskell?
The applications pages don't seem to list one.
(Haxcel and Vital are not really the kind of thing being sought.)
Or, is there a Python binding for Haskell -- in which
case one could infiltrate gnumeric. There seems to
be some echo of a similar question
{-# LANGUAGE specification #-}
where specification is one or more (if compatible) of keywords like
Haskell98 Pure Haskell 98, no extensions.
SharedExtenisons (Haskell02???) A set of agreed-upon extensions
Hello all.
I'd be interested in getting some feedback on how to do this linear
interpolation function a little more cleanly. The normal way that this
is taught is to find the set of indices in the x list that bracket the
input value, then use the slope between these points to calculate the y
Looks fine to me. A few things to think about:
- Some of the keywords specify an entire language (eg. Haskell98),
whereas some are language modifiers (eg. FFI). We might want
to make a distinction. Currently GHC supports only Haskell98 +
modifiers.
Yes.
- Are extensions
hello,
i have no strong feelings about that either way,
however since in haskell we do not have let vs let rec distinctions,
perhaps we should not have do vs do rec distinction.
this of course would break programs relying on shadowing
(and at least i write quite a few of those, but that is mostly
Although a number of comments in this discussion make some sense,
I personally am getting worried about the direction that it is taking.
I have been a (fairly quiet) Haskell user for some time. I like it
because of the strong connection to standard mathematical constructs,
and the dedication to
Bruce I. Mills wrote:
I also don't see the point of the language configuration pragmas
either. Uniformity is important. Instead of agreeing to disagree,
and coming up with a rag-bag language, the points need to be nutted
out until they make consistent sense. The pragmas do not represent
any
The arguments being made here can all be found in the recursive monad
bindings papers and Levent's thesis.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:41:24AM -0700, Brandon Michael Moore wrote:
In any case, I don't see the need for explicit rec groups. Can't GHC just
find the strongly connected components like
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Ross Paterson wrote:
The arguments being made here can all be found in the recursive monad
bindings papers and Levent's thesis.
I don't remember anything about finding smaller binding groups in the
mdo paper. I don't think I've read Levent's thesis.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003
Ton, Henrick,
| The importance of Haskell is [...] the emphasis it puts on the
| manner in which the total function is decomposed. [...]
Would the picture be less gloomy if you said the emphasis I put on...
rather than the emphasis [Haskell] puts on...?
At first reading, I would have
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although a number of comments in this discussion make some sense,
I personally am getting worried about the direction that it is taking.
I have been a (fairly quiet) Haskell user for some time. I like it
because of the strong connection to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- There are features you might want to *disable*. eg.
GHC lets you turn off the monomorphism restriction.
NoMonomorphismRestriction?
Perhaps something like this:
{-# LANGUAGE Haskell98 +FFI -MonomorphismRestriction #-}
Nice!
I feel pragmas embedded in
On 2003-09-17 at 10:31EDT Gordon James Miller wrote:
Something I think is more café than language:
Hello all.
I'd be interested in getting some feedback on how to do this linear
interpolation function a little more cleanly. The normal way that this
is taught is to find the set of indices
Simon Marlow writes:
hGetLine should work fine, indeed that's what I used in the Haskell
Web Server.
Well, another -- and more important -- problem with hGetLine is that
it will read an arbitrarily long line. An attacker might use this to
implement an denial-of-service attack simply by
26 matches
Mail list logo
