In case this is of interest, there is another novel way that a language
might support liftTup in full generality. Example code:
> LiftTup(f:function)(a:f.dom,b:f.dom)={f(a),f(b)}
> f(x:int)=x+1
> LiftTup(f)(3,7)
{4,8}
> LiftTup(caps)("Hello","Goodbye")
{"HELLO","GOODBYE"}
Here, the type system
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:49:43PM +1100, Lloyd Allison wrote:
> We are trying to build and call some Haskell code
> in and from from the open-src spreadsheet "gn'meric".
> It seems that it could be a good basis for experiments in FP + SSs.
Hi,
I'm afraid I don't have anything helpful to say, as
==
1st International Workshop on
Web Services and Formal Methods
(WS-FM 2004)
February 23, 2004, Pisa, Italy
Workshop affiliated to COO
Am Freitag, 21. November 2003, 13:42 schrieb Simon Marlow:
> [...]
Hello again,
thanks for your response.
> There are two issues:
>
> Q. Will Haddock parse a file containing Template Haskell code?
> A. No, the parser doesn't currently understand the TH extensions.
Is it planned to let it unde
> the Haddock documentation says:
> -S, --docbook
> Reserved for future use (output documentation in SGML
> DocBook format).
> I would appreciate very much if the output wouldn't be just
> in SGML DocBook
> but in XML DocBook format. Would it be possible to implement
> it this way?
We are trying to build and call some Haskell code
in and from from the open-src spreadsheet "gn'meric".
It seems that it could be a good basis for experiments in FP + SSs.
We have worked through the simple FFI examples and
can create small C+Haskell stand-alone programs.
However, gnu'eric is qui
> is Haddock compatible with Template Haskell or does it get
> confused by $(...)
> syntax? If it is compatible, how does the documentation of
> TH-generated code look?
There are two issues:
Q. Will Haddock parse a file containing Template Haskell code?
A. No, the parser doesn't currently
Hello,
the Haddock documentation says:
-S, --docbook
Reserved for future use (output documentation in SGML DocBook format).
I would appreciate very much if the output wouldn't be just in SGML DocBook
but in XML DocBook format. Would it be possible to implement it this way?
Wolfgang
Hello,
is Haddock compatible with Template Haskell or does it get confused by $(...)
syntax? If it is compatible, how does the documentation of TH-generated code
look?
Wolfgang
___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman
