Am Freitag, 2. Januar 2004 14:02 schrieb Per Larsson:
> Hi,
>
> When you have a good understanding of a programming library and only need
> to quickly refresh your memory regarding the type signature of a specific
> function, etc., I find man pages very convenient. Are there any plans of
> adding
Per Larsson writes:
> Are there any plans of adding this as an alternative
> output format in Haddock?
It might be easiest to support Docbook output in Haddock and
to generate all other formats from that -- including "man"
a.k.a. nroff. Adapting the HTML output for SGML or XML is
probably less
Hi,
When you have a good understanding of a programming library and only need to
quickly refresh your memory regarding the type signature of a specific
function, etc., I find man pages very convenient. Are there any plans of
adding this as an alternative output format in Haddock? If not, mayb
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
[...] I'm looking for a documentation about these things.
AFAIK there is no real documentation for this, but "Use the Source, Luke!"
(i.e. HaddockUtil.hs :-): The recognized labels are "Module", "Copyright",
"License", "Maintainer", "Stability", and "Portability". This fits
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
does Hugs understand C preprocessor macros? If not, your approach would be
bad for me since I try to stay Hugs-compatible.
Well, Hugs itself doesn't understand CPP macros (neither does GHC), but you
can use Hugs' -F flag to pipe the source files through before
Hugs actual
Hello,
the sources of the hierarchical libraries contain things like
Portability : portable
in the module descriptions. Some of these property descriptions make it into
the HTML documentation, some not.
I'm looking for a documentation about these things. Why doesn't the Haddock
User Guide
> Therefore, I still provide
> the old Hugs 1998 may version just to enable people to play with it.
Unfortunately, http://www.cs.uu.nl/~daan/download/hugs98may.exe is broken
(cut at 256k boundary?).
> As Bjorn said, the good news is that people at Chalmers try to update
haskellDB for
> use in cur
Hi Kyra,
Trying to play with haskell/db, I've found myself being a little bit stuck.
The latest version of hugs haskell/db (as referenced from
http://www.haskell.org/haskellDB/download.html) works with seems to be of
May 1999. I cannot find any references to this version of hugs except
http://www
