Re: [GHC] #5664: Missing checks for FFI declaration types

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5664: Missing checks for FFI declaration types -+-- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: pcapriotti Type: bug | Status: new Priority:

Re: [GHC] #5664: Missing checks for FFI declaration types

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5664: Missing checks for FFI declaration types -+-- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: pcapriotti Type: bug | Status: patch Priority:

Re: [GHC] #5555: support qualified names for invoking a quasiquoter

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#: support qualified names for invoking a quasiquoter --+- Reporter: nfrisby| Owner: pcapriotti Type: feature request| Status: patch Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #5555: support qualified names for invoking a quasiquoter

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#: support qualified names for invoking a quasiquoter +--- Reporter: nfrisby| Owner: pcapriotti Type: feature request| Status: closed Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #5984: TH: newtypes are converted to datas

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5984: TH: newtypes are converted to datas -+-- Reporter: mikhail.vorozhtsov | Owner: pcapriotti Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal |

Re: [GHC] #5984: TH: newtypes are converted to datas

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5984: TH: newtypes are converted to datas -+-- Reporter: mikhail.vorozhtsov | Owner: pcapriotti Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal |

Re: [GHC] #5976: Panic in a user Template Haskell function is wrongly reported as a GHC bug

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5976: Panic in a user Template Haskell function is wrongly reported as a GHC bug -+-- Reporter: SimonMeier | Owner: pcapriotti Type: bug | Status: patch

Re: [GHC] #5976: Panic in a user Template Haskell function is wrongly reported as a GHC bug

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5976: Panic in a user Template Haskell function is wrongly reported as a GHC bug -+-- Reporter: SimonMeier | Owner: pcapriotti Type: bug | Status: merge

Re: [GHC] #5820: defining instance in GHCi leads to duplicated instances

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5820: defining instance in GHCi leads to duplicated instances -+-- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #3591: A working program reports loop when compiled with -O

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#3591: A working program reports loop when compiled with -O -+-- Reporter: blamario| Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: closed Priority:

Re: [GHC] #5980: Name of compiler mismatch in safeHaskell/ghci/p5 p7 p8

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5980: Name of compiler mismatch in safeHaskell/ghci/p5 p7 p8 -+-- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: highest

[GHC] #5987: Too many symbols in ghc package DLL

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5987: Too many symbols in ghc package DLL -+-- Reporter: igloo | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: highest |

Re: [GHC] #5612: Better support for kinds in Template Haskell

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5612: Better support for kinds in Template Haskell ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority:

Re: [GHC] #5612: Better support for kinds in Template Haskell

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5612: Better support for kinds in Template Haskell ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: patch Priority:

[GHC] #5988: Safe Haskell doesn't report all reasons why safe inference fails

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5988: Safe Haskell doesn't report all reasons why safe inference fails ---+ Reporter: dterei | Owner: dterei Type: bug| Status:

[GHC] #5989: Haddock reports wrong safe haskell mode

2012-04-03 Thread GHC
#5989: Haddock reports wrong safe haskell mode --+- Reporter: dterei| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

[Haskell] CFP: Graph Computation Models (GCM2012)

2012-04-03 Thread Rachid Echahed
--- CALL FOR PAPERS GCM 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Graph Computation Models Bremen, Germany, September 29th, 2012

[Haskell-cafe] GSOC Proposal 2012 : HDBC

2012-04-03 Thread pranjal pandit
Hi, I would like to work on improving the HDBC as a GSOC project 2012. I have a previous working experience with Django and its ORM and I had a look at Amnesia (http://amnesia.sourceforge.net/user_manual/manual.html) which is a SQL database interface for Erlang. Few of the features of both

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Conduits: Is Source a valid instance of Monad?

2012-04-03 Thread Paul Liu
Is there any follow up on this? I was wondering what is the best way to sequence a number of sources together. Anybody gave a further thought on this? Regards, Paul Liu On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Aristid Breitkreuz arist...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi all, As you may have noticed, Michael

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Fail-back monad

2012-04-03 Thread Alberto G. Corona
Thaks Oleg for your clarification. I thoutgh on the use or ErrorT or something similar but the fact is that i need many bacPoints, not just one. That is, The user can go many pages back in the navigation pressing many times te back buttton.,. My code has a failure detection in each backPoint , so

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Fail-back monad

2012-04-03 Thread Alberto G. Corona
But, on my side, BackT [BackPoint 1] and BackT [NoBack 1] can be made indistinguishable outside the code where the monad is defined. Probably the effect required is not possible without breaking the law 2012/3/31 Ross Paterson r...@soi.city.ac.uk: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:34:29AM +0100,

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Conduits: Is Source a valid instance of Monad?

2012-04-03 Thread yi huang
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Paul Liu nine...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any follow up on this? I was wondering what is the best way to sequence a number of sources together. Anybody gave a further thought on this? I believe sequence sources together can already be done by `Monoid`

Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: fast-tags-0.0.1

2012-04-03 Thread Evan Laforge
I recently uploaded fast-tags-0.0.3. The main thing is that all the performance problems I was able to find have been fixed---hopefully will no longer be mistaken as an April Fools joke! Here's copy and paste from the hackage description: Changes since 0.0.2: Lots of speed ups, especially when

[Haskell-cafe] thread killed

2012-04-03 Thread tsuraan
What sorts of things can cause a thread to get an asynchronous thread killed exception? I've been seeing rare, inexplicable thread killed messages in my Snap handlers for a long time, but they aren't from Snap's timeout code. I recently upgraded to ghc 7.4.1, and that caused the kills to happen