#6128: ghc 7.4.1 does not work with LDAP-0.6.6
-+--
Reporter: magicloud| Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal
#4321: Unexpected stack overflow prevented by superfluous type annotation
---+
Reporter: bjpop | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority:
#6129: Failure when using promoted data family instances, again
--+-
Reporter: dreixel | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal
#2289: Needless reboxing of values when returning from a tight loop
---+
Reporter: dons| Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
#6099: filepath library a lot bigger in 7.4.2 RC 1
-+--
Reporter: igloo | Owner: pcapriotti
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: highest |
#6099: filepath library a lot bigger in 7.4.2 RC 1
-+--
Reporter: igloo | Owner: pcapriotti
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: highest |
#6130: Weak pointer to MVar is finalized, even though MVar is still accessible
-+--
Reporter: jmillikin| Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Hi all,
I'm trying to build a relocatable package using cabal, and running
into some difficulties.
I've created / used the following script to attempt to create a
relocatable package:
https://github.com/gfxmonk/0compile-cabal-build/blob/2cf4a08b146333d9292f6f8fd38431dd5c5c80f1/cabal-build
When
On 28 May 2012 05:36, Tim Cuthbertson t...@gfxmonk.net wrote:
- ghc doesn't seem to support ${pkgroot} prefixes. I thought it did,
but I'm new to this so I may be misunderstanding where they can be
used.
I thought it did too since I think I wrote the code for it. I don't
recall exactly what
I signed up for an account on http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ to
report a couple of bugs, but can't file them until my email address is
verified.
I've tried two different email addresses, waited more than 24 hours,
and checked my spam folder but sill don't see anything. Is email
sending
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:09:47AM +1000, Tim Cuthbertson wrote:
I signed up for an account on http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ to
report a couple of bugs, but can't file them until my email address is
verified.
I've tried two different email addresses, waited more than 24 hours,
and
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 28 May 2012 05:36, Tim Cuthbertson t...@gfxmonk.net wrote:
- ghc doesn't seem to support ${pkgroot} prefixes. I thought it did,
but I'm new to this so I may be misunderstanding where they can be
used.
I
The deadline is on Friday!
Cheers,
Andres
==
CALL FOR PAPERS
WGP 2012
8th ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Generic Programming
*** CALL FOR PARTICIPATION ***
LOLA 2012
Syntax and Semantics of Low Level Languages
Sunday 24th June 2012, Dubrovnik, Croatia
A LICS 2012-affiliated workshop
Sorry for the wrong information. I made a mistake when did the test.
After more testing, I think it is a bug of ghc 7.4.1. Until now, I
cannot find a way to make ghc 7.4.1 compiled binary work.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Alright,
Sorry for the wrong information. I made a mistake when did the test.
After more testing, I think it is a bug of ghc 7.4.1. Until now, I cannot
find a way to make ghc 7.4.1 compiled binary work.
It sounds like this should be looked at further. Somebody should verify try to
repeat what you
observe $ flip runStateT 10 $ (put 0 mzero) | modify (+3)
((),13)
If the only thing you need is backtracking, using LogicT might be a little
overkill, using Maybe in the bottom of you monad stack suits just fine:
case flip runStateT 10 $ (put 0 mzero) | modify (+3) of
Just x -
Sorry for the wrong information. I made a mistake when did the test.
After more testing, I think it is a bug of ghc 7.4.1. Until now, I cannot
find a way to make ghc 7.4.1 compiled binary work.
I have set up this test on 7.4.1 and I cannot recreate the problem -- compiling
and running an
* Yves Parès yves.pa...@gmail.com [2012-05-28 11:28:22+0200]
observe $ flip runStateT 10 $ (put 0 mzero) | modify (+3)
((),13)
If the only thing you need is backtracking, using LogicT might be a little
overkill, using Maybe in the bottom of you monad stack suits just fine:
case flip
Actually, I think the backtracking property here stems more from the
MonadPlus StateT instance than from the properties of Maybe.
(mplus a b runs a and b by passing explicitely the same state to them).
2012/5/28 Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info
* Yves Parès yves.pa...@gmail.com [2012-05-28
(English message follows after the break.)
Olá!
Estamos procurando um estagiário para trabalhar conosco em São Paulo
capital. Nós somos uma startup apaixonada por Haskell com uma boa
participação na comunidade e grandes projetos e desafios!
Se você está interessado, basta me mandar um e-mail
Gábor Lehel illissius at gmail.com writes:
If you're referring to the NewAxioms work Simon linked to ... [snip]
... It seems vaguely similar to a paper on instance chains[2]
I saw once.
Thanks Gábor for the reference, but I don't think they're very comparable.
The instance chains is in
Interesting. I have this code tested in Debian unstable/stable, CentOS
6.1, all 64 bit, with two different version of libldap2.
At first, Debian-s were installed with 7.4.1, CentOS with 7.2.2. Only
in CentOS the code connected after compiled.
Then I removed 7.4.1 from Debian stable and installed
23 matches
Mail list logo
