[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had an idea stewing in my head to do with per-type function
namespaces, .
The idea that I've been throwing around is to be able to define a
separate namespace for each type; a function can either belong in a
"global" (default) namespace, or belong in a particul
John Goerzen wrote:
Python can work that way, but also adds another feature:
try:
blah
moreblah
finally:
foo
And in Haskell we have catch(Dyn), bracket, and finally. Are these not
enough?
I hadn't been aware of finally. That does seem to help.
One of the things I like about exceptions in
