Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime

2000-08-03 Thread Chris Saunders

Why not Linux?

Regards
Chris Saunders
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message -
From: "Bill Halchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime


> To Linux?   :^)
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Chris Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Erik Meijer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime
> >Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:24:14 -0400
> >
> >It seems to me that this .Net thingy is a runtime
> >and therefore could potentially be as portable
> >as anything from Java.  This runtime just needs
> >to be ported to other operating systems similarily
> >to the Java runtime.
> >
> >Regards
> >Chris Saunders
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Kevin Glynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Erik Meijer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 8:57 PM
> >Subject: Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't believe this says anything about support for other OS's.  I
> > > think the devices here are hardware, (PCs, handhelds, phones, fridge
> > > interfaces, ...)  Of course Microsoft believes that some day, very
> > > soon, all devices will run (a version of) Windows.  Hence this
> > > statement refers to Microsoft's announced plans to port .NET to all
> > > Windows OS's, including WinCE.
> > >
> > > Do you have another reference which is more convincing?
> > >
> > > k
> > >
> > >
> > > Erik Meijer writes:
> > >  > > Not "at least" but "only". I haven't heard of plans for .NET on
any
> > >  > > non-Windows platform.
> > >  >
> > >  > Then you should listen more closely! a quote from the .NET
> >whitepaper:
> > >  >
> > >  > Microsoft .NET proactively adapts to what you
> > >  > want to do, on any of your devices. This inversion
> > >  > of the traditional installation-dependent application
> > >  > model is a necessity in a world where users will
> > >  > enjoy the benefits of services on multiple devices.
> > >  >
> > >  > http://www.microsoft.com/net/
> > >  >
> > >  > Erik
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>





Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime

2000-08-03 Thread Chris Saunders

It seems to me that this .Net thingy is a runtime
and therefore could potentially be as portable
as anything from Java.  This runtime just needs
to be ported to other operating systems similarily
to the Java runtime.

Regards
Chris Saunders
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message - 
From: "Kevin Glynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Erik Meijer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime


> 
> 
> I don't believe this says anything about support for other OS's.  I
> think the devices here are hardware, (PCs, handhelds, phones, fridge
> interfaces, ...)  Of course Microsoft believes that some day, very
> soon, all devices will run (a version of) Windows.  Hence this
> statement refers to Microsoft's announced plans to port .NET to all
> Windows OS's, including WinCE.
> 
> Do you have another reference which is more convincing?
> 
> k
> 
> 
> Erik Meijer writes:
>  > > Not "at least" but "only". I haven't heard of plans for .NET on any
>  > > non-Windows platform.
>  > 
>  > Then you should listen more closely! a quote from the .NET whitepaper:
>  > 
>  > Microsoft .NET proactively adapts to what you 
>  > want to do, on any of your devices. This inversion 
>  > of the traditional installation-dependent application 
>  > model is a necessity in a world where users will 
>  > enjoy the benefits of services on multiple devices.
>  > 
>  > http://www.microsoft.com/net/
>  > 
>  > Erik
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>