can be found at
http://research.microsoft.com/aboutmsr/jobs/cambridgepostdoc.aspx
Don Syme
MSR Cambridge
http://research.microsoft.com/aboutmsr/labs/cambridge/default.aspx
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman
be a perfect place to try out that theory.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Manuel M. T. Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 31.05.2002 03:27
To: Don Syme
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
large code bases for
alternative purposes (unless you've got loads of resources to throw at
the problem).
Cheers,
Don
-Original Message-
From: Simon Peyton-Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 May 2002 15:31
To: Don Syme; D. Tweed
Cc: Paul Hudak; haskell
Subject: RE: [Fwd: F#]
|
> > ... But the only truly serious complications added by .NET
> > itself are (a) the general problem of Haskell interop with
imperative
> > libraries, requiring you to reach for monads quite often (or to wrap
> > the libraries yourself) and (b) ...
> >
> > IMHO problem (a) will always be the thin
ROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 May 2002 15:25
To: Don Syme
Cc: Paul Hudak; haskell
Subject: RE: [Fwd: F#]
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Don Syme wrote:
> going to provide. Given the general complexity of GHC, the longish
> compile times and the reliance of the GHC library implementation on C
> and C librarie
Hey Sigbjorn, that looks great! I'll look forward to trying it out.
Perhaps when the source release is available someone could look at
getting hugs98.net to be able to interop. with ILX components as well,
making combined F#/hugs98.net apps feasible. I'm one who believe both
Haskell and ML have
lines of code if at all possible, as is the case for F#.
Those of us at MSR have no particular plans to push further on
Haskell.NET right now, but I know a number of other people have talked
about taking a crack at it.
Best wishes,
Don Syme
MSR Cambridge
-Original Message-
From: Paul
good shape by industrial standards.
Many aspects are being submitted to ECMA, and I believe we can have
confidence that such a standards body will only accept them when they have
reached a sufficiently high level of quality.
Cheers!
Don Syme
---
