On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:03:48PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Xyne wrote:
>> Hi Magnus,
>>
>> Everything seems to be working as expected. Have you overcome the
>> problems of ensuring a secure custody chain?
>
> I'm
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 06:00:02PM +0100, Fabio Riga wrote:
> 2011/12/20 Magnus Therning
>
>> Den 20 dec 2011 04:58 skrev "Bernardo Barros" :
>>
>>> Arch is not a testing distro... And it's not even up to date with
>>> Haskell Platform. If yo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:52:02PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I'm currently removing a few gtk-related packages from [haskell] since
> these packages already exist in [community].
>
> Please hold off any modifications to the repo until I've finished
> doing th
>
> why would it be necessary for Haddock to be listed by ghc-pkg? The way I
> see it, "cabal configure" should simply find Haddock in $PATH, no?
Haddock (on Hackage) is both a program and a library. GHC doesn't
include the library (only the program), and I'm
se tag on a previous changeset if we
don't want this in our HABS tree yet.
/M
--
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
tory to the kiwilight.com server. The target "make src" will generate
> a whole bunch of taurballs that can be published on AUR using the aurupload
> utility. The set of packages that is being built is determined by this file:
>
> http://github.com/peti/arch-haskell/blob/maste
n /usr/lib/glib-2.0.
>
> So the first directory hierarchy looks much more logical to me. It is
> obtained by using the option
> --libsubdir=\$compiler/site-local/\$pkgid
> in the "runhaskell Setup configure" command.
That looks like a worthwhile ch
