G'day all.
Quoting Benjamin Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> However, not everyone in the OO camp thinks that UML is really useful:
>
> http://archive.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/bmarticles/uml/page.html
Having actually used it (once), the consensus seems to be:
1. It only applies to a "pu
On Thursday 19 January 2006 14:09, Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
> In object-oriented programming, UML is used to model programs. In
> functional programming (especially Haskell) we use ???
However, not everyone in the OO camp thinks that UML is really useful:
http://archive.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/techno
Philippa Cowderoy and Mads Lindstrom wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Philippa Cowderoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mads Lindstrøm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Haskell] Modelling languages for FP (like
Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
> In object-oriented programming, UML is used to model programs. In
> functional programming (especially Haskell) we use ???
Nice question.
The problem with UML class diagrams is that they are
only really suited to "classical" OO (composition and inheritance)
and thus are m
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Mads [ISO-8859-1] Lindstrøm wrote:
> Hi all
>
> In object-oriented programming, UML is used to model programs. In
> functional programming (especially Haskell) we use ???
>
Haskell :-)
> I am mainly interested in the macro level. That is modules, classes,
> class instances
Hi all
In object-oriented programming, UML is used to model programs. In
functional programming (especially Haskell) we use ???
The only graphical modellering language I have found is FAD:
http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/2001/1152/ .
Are there other approaches?
Are anybody, except for the creates
