Andrzej Jaworski wrote: > Nevertheless my point is still valid: when on compiler side the heap is > stretched and on program side you need Ockham's Razor in action Haskell > chokes. I hoped at least to stimulate interest in repeating GP experiment > with latest GHC version. This could make a hot publication and save nice > people from reappearance of this thread:-) > > (the experiment: > http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/stg/sfpw/book/Garmendia-Doval/cameraready.ps)
It's no wonder that code like Prelude.foldl (f) (k, False, 0.0) (BoolVector.assocs bs) chokes. Here, bs is an immutable array, Also, the SML version uses Vectors, "polymorphic vectors, immutable sequences with constant-time access". I wonder how immutable these are. I suspect that changing elements does updates in place with history tracking? Regards, apfelmus _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
