. Diatchki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: 04 December 2001 18:41
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: Haskell 98 Revised
|
|
| hello,
|
| it seems that if the qualified names in instance declarations
| are removed, the qualified methods (data constructors) in
| exports ought to be removed
2001 12:03
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Cc: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Subject: Haskell 98 Revised
|
|
| Gentle Haskellers
|
| The December issue of the Haskell 98 Report is done.
|
| http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/haskell98-revised
|
| As usual, changes are highlighted in the overall
Hi!
For whatever that is worth, my semantics agrees with Simon's point here,
ie in the example code
module M( C(op1) ) where-- NB: op2 not exported
class C a where
op1 :: a-a
op2 :: a-a
module N where
import M
Gentle Haskellers
The December issue of the Haskell 98 Report is done.
http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/haskell98-revised
As usual, changes are highlighted in the overall bugs list thus: [Dec
2001],
so you can find them easily.
There are the usual crop of presentational
hello,
it seems that if the qualified names in instance declarations are removed,
the qualified methods (data constructors) in exports ought to be removed as
well. example: currently in Haskell one may write
module M ( P.C(Q.f) ) where
import qualified P
import qualified Q
...
qualifying the
|
http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/haskell98-revised/haskell98-repor
t-html/index.html
| says Revised: October 2001 - am I seeing the latest version?
Yes you are -- my mistake.
| You still have
| lexeme - ... | qop | ...
| in the lexical syntax but have
| qop - qvarop | qconop
|
Hi Simon
It's that time of the month. I'm putting out the November release
of the Revised Haskell 98 Report. As ever, I earnestly seek your
feedback.
In appendix B (syntax), B.3 (layout) says
* A stream of tokens as specified by the lexical syntax in the Haskell
report, with the
Haskellers!
It's that time of the month. I'm putting out the November release
of the Revised Haskell 98 Report. As ever, I earnestly seek your
feedback. Especially I'd like to know whether I have stumbled
in rewriting the section about Enum in the light of recent email.
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:30:36AM -0800, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Haskellers!
Hi Simon :-)
It's that time of the month. I'm putting out the November release
of the Revised Haskell 98 Report. As ever, I earnestly seek your
feedback. Especially I'd like to know whether I have stumbled
