RE: Haskell libraries, support status, and range of applicability(was:Haskell jobs)

2000-08-01 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| I do not want to sound too negative. I am always happy about | suggestions for improving haskell.org (especially if they do not imply | too much work ;-). Olaf, I do think that a simple interface to let one add an entry to the page would be well worth while. It puts more control in the

RE: Haskell libraries, support status, and range of applicability(was:Haskell jobs)

2000-07-26 Thread Simon Marlow
Simon, can you tell me how I shall link to hslibs, especially each individual library? Obviously a user would also like to download a single library. That's not so obvious to me. We're going to the effort of packaging up all these libraries into a single coherent collection, that can be

Re: Haskell libraries, support status, and range of applicability(was:Haskell jobs)

2000-07-26 Thread Florian Hars
Olaf Chitil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The latter is exactly what I do and how 99% of the information about tools and libraries were collected. The main page of haskell.org asks for information about projects, compilers, papers, classes, or anything else but we hardly receive any. This is a

Re: Haskell libraries, support status, and range of applicability(was:Haskell jobs)

2000-07-25 Thread Jan Skibinski
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Claus Reinke wrote: Jan Skibinski: On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Claus Reinke wrote: [List of some examples of library status information..] Someone asks about GUIs on comp.lang.functional, on the Haskell list, or elsewhere, and we just point them towards the

Re: Haskell libraries, support status, and range of applicability(was:Haskell jobs)

2000-07-25 Thread Olaf Chitil
I have never submitted any request to the maintainers of www.haskell.org to place links to my modules. Yet, several of them are there, and that tells me that either John or Olaf does occasional scan of messages from this list and update the pages from