On Friday 20 December 2002 03:16 pm, David Sankel wrote:
I was referring to a haskell interpreter to be used
within haskell code. For instance:
main = do
user_configuration - parseHaskell
title - resolveFunction user_configuration title
:: String
putStr title
My next language
Lauri Alanko wrote on Dec 22:
The magic is _here_:
(begin (define a 5) (eval '(set! a (+ a 1)) (interaction-environment)) a)
== 6
Here (interaction-enviroment) is a run-time representation of the
compile-time environment. It makes possible two-way interaction between the
stages.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:43:07PM +0100, Frank Atanassow wrote:
There is quite a bit of work on staged evalution, metaprogramming,
quasiquotation, reflection and run-time code generation in typed and ML-like
languages. It's a very active and, IMO, promising area of research.
Yes. Thanks for
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
David J. Sankel wrote:
I was referring to a haskell interpreter to be used
within haskell code. For instance:
This was exactly the gist of the message:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2002-September/003423.html
The message gave the working
I was wondering if there is any project that aims to
interpret haskell within haskell.
Is it feasable that a program can import a user's .hs
file that has something like:
greeting :: String
greeting = Something
port :: Int
port = 32 + 33
And the program can parse and execute the
: 2
Subject: RE: Interpret haskell within haskell.
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:04:39 -
From: Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Sankel [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was wondering if there is any project that aims to
interpret haskell within haskell.
=20
Is it feasable
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Matt Hellige wrote:
[Christopher Milton [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--- David Sankel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there is any project that aims to
interpret haskell within haskell.
[... snipped intro to ghci ...]
If you have defined functions in
For what it's worth, I will probably be doing my MSc thesis on
adapting eval (and reflection in general) to a statically typed
language. Essentially you need a run-time representation of the
environment and the typing context, and a type system which groks the
relationship between run-time and
John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I want to do this kind of thing, I use hugs as a back-end. I
write the expressions I want to evaluate, or whatever, to a file of
hugs commands, and then run
system hugs hugsinput hugsoutput
then read and process the output (choose your
Lauri Alanko wrote (on 20-12-02 11:26 +0200):
For what it's worth, I will probably be doing my MSc thesis on
adapting eval (and reflection in general) to a statically typed
language. Essentially you need a run-time representation of the
environment and the typing context, and a type system
--- Christopher Milton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- David Sankel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there is any project that aims
to
interpret haskell within haskell.
http://www.haskell.org/implementations.html
quote type=partial
GHC, the Glasgow Haskell Compiler
The
Hello,
I am not sure to be relevant but I think :
* This kind of thing would be very useful in Haskell, as this language
has shown to be very usable to model foreign problems and do Domain
Specific Language. It would, for example, allow to use a domain
specific haskell script in an Haskell
David J. Sankel wrote:
I was referring to a haskell interpreter to be used
within haskell code. For instance:
main = do
user_configuration - parseHaskell
title - resolveFunction user_configuration title
:: String
putStr title
This was exactly the gist of the message:
--- David Sankel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there is any project that aims to
interpret haskell within haskell.
http://www.haskell.org/implementations.html
quote type=partial
GHC, the Glasgow Haskell Compiler
The Glasgow Haskell compiler is a full implementation of
[Christopher Milton [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--- David Sankel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there is any project that aims to
interpret haskell within haskell.
[... snipped intro to ghci ...]
If you have defined functions in myprog.hs:
:load myprog.hs
then the functions defined
15 matches
Mail list logo
