Re: Spam on the Trac
On 20/07/10 17:05, Sean Leather wrote: I just saw a lot of spam posts to the GHC Trac. Is there any way to prevent future occurrences of this? All the spam has been removed from the Trac, though unfortunately we can't remove it from the mailing list archives so easily. I'm not sure exactly who removed it all - I removed some of it, but the spammer account had already been removed when I got there. We do have the Trac spam filter plugin, and since having that enabled we haven't had problems with spam for quite a while. I'm not exactly sure how the recent flurry of spam got through, but we'll have to keep an eye on things and try to diagnose the problem if it happens again. Cheers, Simon ___ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
Re: [***SPAM***] Re: [Haskell-cafe] How does one get off haskell?
On Jun 24, 2010, at 10:41 PM, cas...@istar.ca wrote: Quoting Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com: Serguey Zefirov wrote: I should suggest code generation from Haskell to C#/Java and PHP. Like Barrelfish, Atom, HJScript and many others EDSLs out there. You will save yourself time, you will enjoy Haskell. Probably, you will have problems with management because your programs will appear there in their completeness very suddently. ; I would imagine a bigger problem is that machine-generated C# is probably incomprehensible to humans. ;-) Most machine-generated code is probably incomprehensible to humans. :) What one wants is a translator back and forth, if one could understand the machine-generated code. Maybe you should translate to Perl. Nobody will notice it is machine-generated. Jur ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: {SPAM 04.4} Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] http/ftp library
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:59:55AM +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello brad, Friday, November 23, 2007, 10:10:41 AM, you wrote: if you need comprehensive support of http and ftp in one api/library, as far as i know, the curl bindings are your only choice 1. Haskell binding is not mentioned at http://curl.haxx.se/libcurl/ can we do something to fix it? we should not advertize it yet as it has not been properly packaged and documented (once again, i am hoping to get to this soon!) current source: http://code.haskell.org/curl/ some examples: http://hpaste.org/3529 pgps7zbKRw4AP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
RE: *****SPAM***** Annotation for unfolding wanted
Anybody know what spam detection program is producing this absurd result, so I can make sure I never even think about using it? It's the second such email in two (or possibly three) days. The potential of Bayesian filtering is vastly overstated, but this one has to be a bug or usage error of some sort. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Georg Martius Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 6:21 AM To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org Subject: *SPAM* Annotation for unfolding wanted Spam detection software, running on the system h7568.serverkompetenz.net, has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Tim, thanks for the hint, but I tried this without success. My point is, that I don't want to try a pragma and see whether it works. I would like to specify the requirement that a function has to be in constant space and if it cannot be done, that the program should not compile. Would it be complicated to include in the compiler? [...] Content analysis details: (7.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 95 to 99% [score: 0.9674] 1.9 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [87.172.161.188 listed in combined.njabl.org] 2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [87.172.161.188 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.2 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: *****SPAM***** Annotation for unfolding wanted
Have you tried using the INLINE pragma? http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/pragmas.html#inline-noinline-pragma Cheers, Tim -- Tim Chevalier* catamorphism.org *Often in error, never in doubt You have not proven yourselves smart enough to act that stupid all the time and get away with it. -- Andrea Nemerson ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Spam
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Koen Claessen wrote: * Every once in a while, we get messages like your e-mail is under consideration for sending to the list. This suggests that the mailing list is moderated, and that there is some person deciding on what can and what cannot be sent to the list. I can only recall seeing these on the hugs specific lists (hugs-users, hugs-bugs), not the more general Haskell lists and they seem to be auto-triggered by e-mail size. It wouldn't surprise me to learn they're administered differently from haskell and haskell-cafe and just get relayed through haskell.org. However I fully agree with you that spam is a real problem (I estimate at least 50% of the spam I get comes from the Haskell/hugs lists). ___cheers,_dave_ www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~tweed/ | `It's no good going home to practise email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | a Special Outdoor Song which Has To Be work tel:(0117) 954-5250 | Sung In The Snow' -- Winnie the Pooh ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
RE: Spam
Sorry to bother you with a message about spam. I have noticed two things about this mailing list: * Every once in a while, we get messages like your e-mail is under consideration for sending to the list. This suggests that the mailing list is moderated, and that there is some person deciding on what can and what cannot be sent to the list. (One could discuss wether it is a good idea to send these messages to the whole list rather than just to the person who sent them, but let us not discuss that here.) The list is partly moderated: any message over a certain size, or with too many destination addresses, or with certain keywords, gets held for moderation. The moderation messages you're seeing are caused by viruses (primarily Win32.Klez) which spoof the sender address. The virus messages are always caught by the auto moderation, but sometimes the sender address has been spoofed to be one of the other Haskell lists, so the moderation message gets sent there. Unfortunately causing these messages to be caught by the moderator would lead to an infinite loop... * Very often, we get spam e-mail. This suggests that nobody is moderating the list. Spam is supposed to be caught by SpamAssassin on haskell.org. It's doing a pretty good job so far - I get far fewer messages to moderate, but the occasional one does get through. These two observations are in contradiction with each other. Couldn't we allow list subscribers to submit to the list without problems, whereas non-list subscribers have to be approved by a list moderator? I've resisted doing that because (a) I'm lazy and (b) lots of people are subscribed to the list using addresses which are different from the ones they post with, so we'd have to gradually build up a list of those addresses which are allowed. Well, maybe I'll give it a go for a while. If it's too much hassle expect an advertisment for the moderator's job soon... Cheers, Simon ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
