Superclass instances (Oops)

1991-11-10 Thread haskell-request
Original-Via: uk.ac.nsf; Sun, 10 Nov 91 16:03:39 GMT Original-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | From: john peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | I'll still stick with my opinion on this one, though. Here's more | reasons: | a) This represents a potentially large numb

Superclass instances (Oops)

1991-11-10 Thread haskell-request
Original-Via: uk.ac.nsf; Sun, 10 Nov 91 07:55:42 GMT Paul Hudak writes: I don't understand your example. That's because it's *wrong*! I was obviously thinking of Haskell 2, where the relaxation of the C-T rule allows me to put instance declarations somewhere besides the defining modules of th

Re: Superclass instances (Oops)

1991-11-09 Thread haskell-request
Original-Via: uk.ac.nsf; Sat, 9 Nov 91 15:09:09 GMT | Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1991 18:20:38 EST | From: john peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Subject: Superclass instances (Oops) | | I'll still stick with my opinion on this one, though. Here's more | reasons: | | a) T