Hi all,
I'd like to get into live coding with Haskell. Can you recommend a
good enviroment? I run Ubuntu Linux. I've looked into Haskore withn
Supercollider but it doesn't seem suited to live performance like
something like Chuck or Impromptu. Is there something like this in the
Haskell space?
Tha
[ moving this over from the other thread ]
> For other examples a hierarchical structure is exactly the right thing:
Right, I was assuming a hierarchical score for the reasons you give,
among others. I think I'm agreeing with you :)
>> I'm not totally convinced the integration is valuable, but
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Anton Kholomiov
wrote:
> I think deep reverse example doesn't break music-signal barrier.
> For music structure you can make function
>
> reverseMusic :: Music a -> Music a
>
> And if you are going to reverse signals you are going to write function for
> signals
>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Henning Thielemann
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Stephen Tetley wrote:
>
>> I still don't understand what Evan's reverse instrument models.
>>
>> Is it reversing the sound of a note so it is some function wrapping a
>> unit generator?
>>
>> Or is it reversing a s
I think deep reverse example doesn't break music-signal barrier.
For music structure you can make function
reverseMusic :: Music a -> Music a
And if you are going to reverse signals you are going to write function for
signals
reverseSignal :: Signal -> Signal
and then if 'Music' is 'Functor'
r
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Stephen Tetley wrote:
I still don't understand what Evan's reverse instrument models.
Is it reversing the sound of a note so it is some function wrapping a
unit generator?
Or is it reversing a sequence of notes according to pitch?
I think he means reversing the signal g
On 11 March 2011 08:58, Henning Thielemann
wrote:
> [SNIP] I would have thought that the hierarchical
> structure is also better for music notation, but the actual
> implementations show, that it is not.
Haskore's structure unfortunately maps badly to LilyPond or ABC in a few ways:
Systems reall
Evan Laforge schrieb:
> This sounds like something I've noticed, and if it's the same thing, I
> agree. But I disagree that you need to separate orchestra and score
> to get it. Namely that notes are described hierarchically (e.g.
> phrase1 `then` phrase2 :=: part2 or whatever), but that many mu
