Re: [off-topic] LaTex for [[ ... ]]

2001-06-01 Thread Fergus Henderson
Sorry for the off-topic post, but I figured someone here would know... can anyone please tell me how to do the double-square-bracket symbols that are often used in denotational semantics in LaTex? It's like [[ but a single symbol without the space between the two brackets. (I checked the Latex

Re: [off-topic] LaTex for [[ ... ]]

2001-06-01 Thread Keith Wansbrough
Sorry for the off-topic post, but I figured someone here would know... can anyone please tell me how to do the double-square-bracket symbols that are often used in denotational semantics in LaTex? It's like [[ but a single symbol without the space between the two brackets. (I checked the

Re: [off-topic] LaTex for [[ ... ]]

2001-06-01 Thread Andrew Moran
Joe English wrote: Fergus Henderson wrote: Sorry for the off-topic post, but I figured someone here would know... can anyone please tell me how to do the double-square-bracket symbols that are often used in denotational semantics in LaTex? It's like [[ but a single symbol without the

Re: [off-topic] LaTex for [[ ... ]]

2001-06-01 Thread Ross Paterson
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:41:05PM -0400, Ken Shan wrote: On 2001-06-01T08:41:34-0700, Andrew Moran wrote: There's also \llbracket and \rrbracket, from stmaryrd. They look better than the negative space hack, IMHO (now all I need is for Alan Jeffrey to write in and say that