[Frank Atanassow [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[redirected from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
David Hughes wrote:
It seems to me that I can still use functional
programming paradigm with an imperative language. How can I benefit more
from a functional programming language
I'd like to respectfully disagree with some of this :-)
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Frank Atanassow wrote:
These things are nice, but the more I learn about functional languages, the
more I feel that they are only icing on the cake. The most important thing
about functional languages is that we
is there any haskell interpreter that allows haskell to be used as an embedded
scripting language in a larger application, similar to the way python or tcl,
but more especially guile (the gnu scheme implementation) are often used as
extension languages? i thought i remembered hearing about some
Do any of the decent Haskell compilers allow you to just type function
definitions at an interpreter prompt and use them in subsequent
interactions, as you'd expect from a Lisp environment? I'm fed up of
editing a tiny file separately and typing :reload each time, etc. Surely
I'm missing
Mark Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do any of the decent Haskell compilers allow you to just type function
definitions at an interpreter prompt and use them in subsequent
interactions, as you'd expect from a Lisp environment? I'm fed up of
editing a tiny file separately and typing :reload
