Just check this monad tutorial (attached). It's really great for beginners.
-- Andre
--- Begin Message ---
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 11:26:12 -0300
From: Andre Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: depto.cursos.grad.if098
Subject: Monads for the Working
Cagdas Ozgenc wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> I have very little experience with monads. However my first impression is
> that there is too much thinking process involved in programming with monads,
> and it is very time consuming, at least for a beginner like myself. I don't
> know how productivity c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 25 January 2002 06:14 am, Cagdas Ozgenc wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I have very little experience with monads. However my first impression is
> that there is too much thinking process involved in programming with
> monads, and it is very time co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 25 January 2002 14:14, Cagdas Ozgenc wrote:
>
> What do monad experts think? What do you think of code readability? How
> easy is it to prove that programs written with monads are correct? How does
> changing one function affect other functi
Cagdas,
Is it possible for you to give an
example where you think there is too much thinking
involved? I dont see it.
Writing haskell IO with monads
(with the Do notation) is just a straightforward as
writing C code for the same steps, isnt it? Just try
not to think about it too mu
Greetings.
I have very little experience with monads. However my first impression is
that there is too much thinking process involved in programming with monads,
and it is very time consuming, at least for a beginner like myself. I don't
know how productivity changes once you get used to programm
Andre W B Furtado wrote:
>Well, it's also possible to interchange data between these two monads by:
>
>unsafeIOToST :: IO a -> ST s a
>stToIO :: ST s a -> IO a
>
>Can anyone tell the possible problems related to
>unsafeIOToST?
