Does anybody with their elbows in the
code think variable interpolation and/or
multi-line strings are good/doable ideas?
Would this be the sort of change one could make
without a lot of previous familiarity with
the implementation of Hugs/Ghc?
It would be a *signifigant* boon to those
of us
How should I modify the function below so that characters
are printed
out as they arrive?
printchar :: Handle - IO ()
printchar handle = do c - hGetChar handle
putChar c
Try using
hSetBuffering handle NoBuffering
hSetBuffering stdout
From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody with their elbows in the
code think variable interpolation and/or
multi-line strings are good/doable ideas?
Can't say I have my elbows in the code, but I think that
multi-line strings could be useful. I'm not sure what I
think about variable
Does anybody with their elbows in the
code think variable interpolation and/or
multi-line strings are good/doable ideas?
Would this be the sort of change one could make
without a lot of previous familiarity with
the implementation of Hugs/Ghc?
It would be a *signifigant* boon to those
of
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, David Feuer wrote:
It would be a *signifigant* boon to those
of us trying to get haskell into organizations
by using it as maintainable perl/sh, and
Haskell is not a maintainable perl/sh. It is not a good
language for simple shell scripts, and is not good for
On 12 Feb 2002, Pixel wrote:
eurk
ERROR /usr/share/hugs/lib/exts/ST.hs:48 - Syntax error in type expression
(unexpected `.')
isn't there a way ST.hs would require the extensions? a pragma or something?
someone not knowing the -98 would wonder for a long time about what to do
:-(
That
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 06:36 am, C.Reinke wrote:
Does anybody with their elbows in the
code think variable interpolation and/or
multi-line strings are good/doable ideas?
Would this be the sort of change one could make
without a lot of previous familiarity with
the
hugs and ghc. With hugs, I use the builtin feature, of course. With GHC, we
just use a pre-processor. This is a bit awkward with GHC 5.02 and earlier
versions, but starting with 5.03, GHC now has a proper interface for hooking
in a pre-processor (don't know the details, bug Sigbjorn
