Conor writes:
> newtype Copy a = Copy a deriving Show
>
>data Wonky f
> = Wonky
> | Manky (f (Wonky f))
> deriving Show
> show (Wonky :: Wonky Copy)
> I don't want to start an argument about how to solve this problem. I
> do want to suggest that, for the time being, it would be better to
> r
dear sir/madam
iam contacting you regarding a java problem which i have come
across. My teacher at manchester met has set a problem for
us to solve but thinking his teaching is excellent and everyone understands
him wen no one does I would appreciate you helping me in this problem as it
would sa
Tom Pledger writes:
| C T McBride writes:
| :
| | A little more tinkering, and it looks like it might be
| |
| | show :: Show (f (Wonky f)) => Wonky f -> String
| |
| | Is this really the type of show?
|
| That looks correct to me.
Well, after the first context reduction, anyw
C T McBride writes:
:
| A little more tinkering, and it looks like it might be
|
| show :: Show (f (Wonky f)) => Wonky f -> String
|
| Is this really the type of show?
That looks correct to me.
| If so, no wonder there's a problem.
Yes, there's a vicious circle in context reduction,
Hi
I'm rather fond of fixpoint constructions like this one:
> newtype Copy a = Copy a deriving Show
> data Wonky f
> = Wonky
> | Manky (f (Wonky f))
> deriving Show
(Clearly this is an ill-motivated example, but the real example which
caused this problem is available on request...)
The
The problem is fixed.
I fixed it using the do notation as Rijk said, it worked perfectly.
Now I got two more problems:
1) Should I use the do notation in order to write this result (type IO
[[Float]]) to a file? How?
2) The Glasglow compiler doesn let me compile one library because I use
the func
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Dean Herington wrote:
> If you're using GHC, take a look at module Readline in the util package
> (http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/set/readline.html). I don't know
> which other Haskell systems support this module.
The annoying thing is the way that terminals general
