Can one write withthe Haskell compliler faster code than in
the examples of http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/ where
GHC (old Haskell 98?) seems to be much slower than Ocaml or
Mlton both strict functional languages.
Can one expect any improvements in speed in the future?
Many of
Hello,
In Haskell, backquotes can be used to convert individual identifiers
into infix operators, but not complex expressions. For example,
[1,2,3] `zip` [4,5,6]
is OK, but not
[1,2,3] `zipWith (+)` [4,5,6]
Is there any reason other than potential confusion when one of the two
Is there any reason other than potential confusion when one of the two
backquotes is accidentally omitted?
I thought about this a while ago and I think it probably simply has to do
with complexity of expressions. If you allow arbitrary expressions to
appear within the ticks, you have a
Ken Shan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Haskell, backquotes can be used to convert individual identifiers
into infix operators, but not complex expressions. For example,
[1,2,3] `zip` [4,5,6]
is OK, but not
[1,2,3] `zipWith (+)` [4,5,6]
Is there any reason other than potential
What I also meant but did not write was this: is there anyone who would like
to redo these benchmarks and see what it gives with all the new inventions
the DHC supports?
Cheers
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott J. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
