RE: Implementing forward refs in monadic assembler and interprete r

2002-12-02 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| For the moment I've chosen to do the mdo desugaring manually instead | of moving to the CVS ghc (or exclusively using Hugs.) Will mdo be in | the next release? (That's 5.04.2, I think -- though I've recently | been confused about GHC releases.) The relevant revision to Lex.lhs | is pretty

RE: Implementing forward refs in monadic assembler and interprete r

2002-12-02 Thread Ashley Yakeley
At 2002-12-02 00:37, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: Main things in the next major release are mdo Template Haskell Can mdo be done in TH? It would be nice if there were some kind of macro system for this sort of thing; I know there's also a syntax for Arrows that requires a

RE: AW: slide: useful function?

2002-12-02 Thread Mark Carroll
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, David Bergman wrote: (snip) Till then, we Haskellers will probably continue expressing our patterns either directly in Haskell or using highly formal language, with terms such as catamorphisms. The virtue, and weakness, of traditional design patterns is their vagueness