On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:20:05 +0800
"Tn X-10n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hai guysis it possible to convert IO Bool to Bool?
Read the Gentle Introduction.
http://www.haskell.org/tutorial/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.has
Dear Sir,
I know you may be suprised to receive this mail, especially as we have not met in
person before but Please do not be embarrassed for I mean good. I was opportuned to
have your contact from the South Africa Information Exchange (S.A.I.E.), in my search
for a reliable person to handle
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, blaat blaat wrote:
>
> To many questions, not enough mail. First, thanks for all your replies.
> Second, I stand totally corrected on the fact that we cannot break down
> monads. Functions of type m a->b are called impure,
Haskell is a pure language, so there are *no* impu
Hi all,
I've been following this discussion with some interest.
Last time I looked, hugs, ghc and nhc98 all implemented
I/O differently. No doubt there are even more
alternatives in other Haskell implementations (real or imaginary).
In itself this is probably not too surprising. They are, after
Dear Sir
This letter may come to you as a surprise because we have not met. The decision to
write you is out of a sincere desire to establish a business/mutual relationship with
you. I got your contact through the international trade and commerce chamber (ITCC) in
Madrid.
My name is Mr.
