Hi, Andre,
map (foo 5) my_list_of_lists_of_doubles
...But how to do that (if possible) when I
invert the parameters list ?!
Let me add one more solution, and then summarize:
The problem disapears if you use a list
comprehension instead of map:
[foo x 5 | x - my_list_of_lists_of_doubles]
map (foo 5) my_list_of_lists_of_doubles
1. map (flip foo 5) my_list_of_lists_of_doubles
2. map (`foo` 5) my_list_of_lists_of_doubles
3. map (\x-foo x 5) my_list_of_lists_of_doubles
4. [foo x 5 | x - my_list_of_lists_of_doubles]
well, i've followed this discussion a while, but i did not see
On Sunday 18 September 2005 07:59 am, Tom Hawkins wrote:
Aaron Denney wrote:
On 2005-09-17, Jason Dagit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A link to supertyping can be found here:
http://repetae.net/john/recent/out/supertyping.html
After reading that, I wonder why it's not implemented.
Not
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:14:14PM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
This reminds me that several times now I've wished that Bool was some
sort of interface instead of a type. Perhaps Bool could be a type
class? I also wish that if were a function, but that's probably
just the lisper in me
On 2005-09-18, Tom Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the idea of supertyping, but wouldn't that only allow you to
alter identifiers that were already classified?
Correct.
What about functions in the Prelude that don't belong to a type class?
Nope.
--
Aaron Denney
--
Hi Ralf,
I'm revisiting this project and just have another question. The story
seems to be that GHC cannot derive Typeable1, or Typeable when
Typeable1 is available - so anyone who wants to use ext1Q must define
special instances for all of the datatypes they use, is this correct?
Will this
It could be a bug - can you reduce the example and report it?
GHC's profiler tries to overlay a lexical call graph on to the dynamic
execution of the program. It does this more or less in the way you
described before: every function gets an extra argument describing the
call context.
Hi Frederik,
[I call this the dreadful lack of kind polymorphism strikes back :-)]
I put SPJ on cc; perhaps he can suggest a way to improve in this area.
Based on input, I could try to work on this issue in the not so remote
future.
Let me briefly recapitulate. My recollection is that deriving
