On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:53:18AM +0100, Dusan Kolar wrote:
I wonder whether anybody could advise me how to pass
correctly RTS options to ghc? I've tried
You have to pass these options to the program, not
to GHC.
BTW - it would be nice if it was easier to override the default RTS
options
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Oh no! Converting LaTeX to HTML is terrible, in my opinion. One reason for
this is that LaTeX isn't a markup language and provides a mixture of logical
and visual macros.
Conversely, I've occasionally tried to convert stuff - I think a TMR
issue was one example,
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 10:10 schrieben Sie:
[...]
The ideal is to have a simple, rigid, semantic markup in the source
document. While I dislike XML at least as much as the next guy, it is
probably the best choice for this. Ideally, the DTD should be a lot
simpler than DocBook,
The thing is that I'm launching threads, not processes. The message
is printed by runhaskell now that I think about it.
On Nov 16, 2005, at 1:54 AM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
I've been getting this in lambdabot with waitForProcess since 6.4.1 (I
think). Seems harmless though (I think). Try
Matijs Erisson:
Malcolm Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... And avoid
getting screwed up by malicious folk?
... but I believe there are a number of people who regularly
review all the Recent Changes and undertake to 'undo' any
malicious/inaccurate modifications.
I don't think restricting editing to registered users is a significant
turn off if registration is simple.
It really really is a turn off. Sometimes when I spot a mistake, and
I'm at a computer where I haven't logged in to hawiki, I don't bother
fixing it. No one wants to have yet another
I think runhaskell reports that when the program has crashed
violently with a segmentation violation.
On Nov 16, 2005, at 1:54 AM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
I've been getting this in lambdabot with waitForProcess since 6.4.1 (I
think). Seems harmless though (I think). Try catching the
The public comment/wiki spam problem is easily solved.
Use JavaScript to generate a value and put it in a hidden form field.
Check for that value server side, if it's there then allow the post
otherwise disallow.
Most if not all bots don't have JavaScript engines.
On 16/11/2005, at 10:15
Neil Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It really really is a turn off. Sometimes when I spot a mistake, and
I'm at a computer where I haven't logged in to hawiki, I don't bother
fixing it. No one wants to have yet another account, to fill in their
personal details yet again.
I appreciate
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 12:33 schrieb Scott Weeks:
The public comment/wiki spam problem is easily solved.
Use JavaScript to generate a value and put it in a hidden form field.
Check for that value server side, if it's there then allow the post
otherwise disallow.
Most if not all bots
On 16-nov-2005, at 13:14, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 12:33 schrieb Scott Weeks:
The public comment/wiki spam problem is easily solved.
Use JavaScript to generate a value and put it in a hidden form field.
Check for that value server side, if it's there then allow
Wolfgang Jeltsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would it be intended that every Haskell-related project is hosted under
haskell.org? This might be not so nice. And it might be not so nice if most
Haskell-related projects are hosted under haskell.org so that potential users
might only look under
On 16 November 2005 08:12, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:53:18AM +0100, Dusan Kolar wrote:
I wonder whether anybody could advise me how to pass
correctly RTS options to ghc? I've tried
You have to pass these options to the program, not
to GHC.
BTW - it would be nice
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 01:09:07PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
BTW - it would be nice if it was easier to override the default RTS
options when compiling the program. Perhaps a nice task for a newbie
GHC developer?
Already possible, see:
Folks,
I have a problem catching my IO exception with the code below. The
intent is to catch either the IO exception from connectTo (connection
refused, etc.) or the timeout.
type EngineState = ErrorT String (StateT World IO)
fromIOError err = ioeGetErrorString err
liftIOTrap :: IO a -
I've fixed the HEAD so that it behaves decently on this now. Thanks for
reporting it. It's in the test suite!
S
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel
| Reymont
| Sent: 09 November 2005 19:27
| To: Haskell Cafe
| Subject:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Arthur van Leeuwen wrote:
A nicer solution might be to have the server generate a distorted image
of a key (as is done with user registration to combat automated user
generation)
that should be typed in for an edit to be accepted (if you are not logged
in).
This comes
I fixed up my timeout function to look like this:
timeout :: forall a.Show a = Int - IO a - IO a
timeout secs fun =
mdo mvar - newEmptyMVar
tid1 - forkIO $ do result - try fun
putMVar mvar $
either (Left . show) (Right .
After almost two months with Haskell I'm starting to understand why
its use is not as widespread as... well pick a favorite language of
your own. My issue was that of indentation.
Compare this working version:
liftIOTrap io =
do mx - liftIO (do x - io
return
On 16 November 2005 13:24, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 01:09:07PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
BTW - it would be nice if it was easier to override the default RTS
options when compiling the program. Perhaps a nice task for a newbie
GHC developer?
Already possible, see:
Indeed! I always use braces and semicolons with do-notation. You are
free to do so too! Nothing requires you to use layout. Indeed, you can
freely mix the two.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel
| Reymont
| Sent: 16
On 16 November 2005 11:26, Joel Reymont wrote:
I think runhaskell reports that when the program has crashed
violently with a segmentation violation.
It does, and that's a bug. I fixed it last week.
Cheers,
Simon
On Nov 16, 2005, at 1:54 AM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
I've
On 14 November 2005 08:32, Gour wrote:
Nobody said that DocBook does not work fine. However let me quote
SPJ's message:
quote
However, I still wonder if there are things we could do that would
make
it easier for people to contribute. Here are two concrete
suggestions: ^^^
- Make
I'm writing a program that will be using multiple threads to handle
network activity on multiple ports in a responsive way. The treads
will all need access to some shared data, so I'm using an MVar. So far
so good. The problem is that passing the MVar around everywhere is
kind of a pain, so I was
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Indeed! I always use braces and semicolons with do-notation. You are
free to do so too! Nothing requires you to use layout. Indeed, you can
freely mix the two.
I would not recommend braces and semicolons, because these allow a bad
layout (easy to parse for a
I'm getting crashes like this and I cannot figure out what the
problem is. I'm launching a bunch of threads that connect to a server
via TCP and exchange packets.
I am running operations like connect and receive in a timeout
function that launches two threads and uses an MVar to figure out
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:51:19AM -0500, Kurt Hutchinson wrote:
I have to perform another runReaderT when forking? Or is there a way
to get the ReaderT environment automatically carried over to the newly
created Set B thread?
This is an unavoidable pain as far as I know. It would be nice if
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 05:37:34PM +, Joel Reymont wrote:
I'm getting crashes like this and I cannot figure out what the
problem is. I'm launching a bunch of threads that connect to a server
via TCP and exchange packets.
I am running operations like connect and receive in a timeout
I really don't use more FFI than needed to send and receive binary
packets over the network. I don't even use FPS these days and all the
allocaBytes code checks for nullPtr.
My hunch is that this is to do with killing threads that perform FFI
in my timeout code. It would kill blocking
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:45:17AM -0800, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:51:19AM -0500, Kurt Hutchinson wrote:
I have to perform another runReaderT when forking? Or is there a way
to get the ReaderT environment automatically carried over to the newly
created Set B thread?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:16:48PM +, Joel Reymont wrote:
I really don't use more FFI than needed to send and receive binary
packets over the network. I don't even use FPS these days and all the
allocaBytes code checks for nullPtr.
Then please accept my apologies. I may have confused
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:20:48PM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:45:17AM -0800, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:51:19AM -0500, Kurt Hutchinson wrote:
I have to perform another runReaderT when forking? Or is there a way
to get the ReaderT
On 16/11/05, Philippa Cowderoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Arthur van Leeuwen wrote:
A nicer solution might be to have the server generate a distorted image
of a key (as is done with user registration to combat automated user
generation)
that should be typed in for an
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:20:48PM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
I think it wouldn't be possible using only methods in MonadIO.
Here's what I had in mind for forkProcess. Recall that the fork syscall
returns 0 to the child and
Most if not all bots don't have JavaScript engines.
But not all users use JavaScript.
I can certainly understand that some users don't have JavaScript but
it's the vast minority. The choice is between usability. With captchas
you can exclude the disabled and people with poor eyesight (as
Hello Kurt,
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 7:51:19 PM, you wrote:
KH I'm writing a program that will be using multiple threads to handle
KH network activity on multiple ports in a responsive way. The treads
KH will all need access to some shared data, so I'm using an MVar. So far
KH so good. The
Neil Mitchell:
I don't think restricting editing to registered users is a significant
turn off if registration is simple.
It really really is a turn off. Sometimes when I spot a mistake, and
I'm at a computer where I haven't logged in to hawiki, I don't bother
fixing it. No one wants to
Hello Joel,
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 6:37:25 PM, you wrote:
JR After almost two months with Haskell I'm starting to understand why
JR its use is not as widespread as... well pick a favorite language of
JR your own. My issue was that of indentation.
just enclose potentially problematic
Folks,
The latest GHC docs mention that the -C option takes a seconds value
whereas prior docs mention microseconds. Which is it?
Also, do I pass +RTS -Cxxx or is it just -C?
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
___
Haskell-Cafe
Shae Matijs Erisson:
I have a simple plan for a darcsforge as well:
If Cabal includes a darcs-repository field, developers will be able to upload
their project.cabal file to Hackage or to a darcsforge server.
That server will run darcs pull on the repositories once a night or so.
The
internal error: update_fwd: unknown/strange object 0
Please report this as a bug to glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org,
or http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/ghc/
This happened when I tried running with +RTS -C0 -c I think.
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
Indeed! I always use braces and semicolons with do-notation. You are
free to do so too! Nothing requires you to use layout. Indeed, you can
freely mix the two.
I would not recommend braces and semicolons, because these allow a bad
layout (easy to parse for a compiler, but hard to read for
On 16/11/05, Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed! I always use braces and semicolons with do-notation. You are
free to do so too! Nothing requires you to use layout. Indeed, you can
freely mix the two.
I would not recommend braces and semicolons, because these allow a bad
Kurt,
There are basically two ways of doing that, namely monad transformers
and implicit parameters (we actually use both techniques in lambdabot).
Implicit parameters save you a lot of conversions or explicit passing of
variables because you only need one monad (the IO monad); however they
are
44 matches
Mail list logo
