Dylan Thurston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17 Apr 2006
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 10:16:53PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
I think that without dependent types for a Haskell-like language,
it is impossible to propose any adequate and in the same time plainly
looking algebraic class
Hello Joel,
Monday, April 24, 2006, 5:50:57 AM, you wrote:
For example, you could use tries to store all strings but you could
easily get to the point where you can't load them all into, say, 1Gb
of memory which is all I have on my machine. I'm thinking that the
required data could be
Hi all,
I just started to study Haskell and it is my almost first big experience
with functional languages (except Emacs Lisp and Python). I enjoyed all
small exercises and started a bigger business writing a general utility.
However, I have a problem from the beginning. The utility get some
On 26.04 11:29, Anton Kulchitsky wrote:
I just started to study Haskell and it is my almost first big experience
with functional languages (except Emacs Lisp and Python). I enjoyed all
small exercises and started a bigger business writing a general utility.
However, I have a problem from
Hi -
Given some large list of modules which need to be used qualified, I'd like
to be able to make a convenience module that I could use instead, and which
would export all these modules also qualified by an alias, ie:
module Top
( module qualified Top.First as First
, module
