Very, very helpful Chris; thanks; and thanks also to the many other helpful
haskellers.
They have (hopefully working) cabal files to make compiling and installing
ea\
sy.
Unfortunately, not so easy, for PCRE.regex. But hopefully this is just due
to my ignorance and there's a simple
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 17:51 +, Pedro Baltazar Vasconcelos wrote:
Hello all,
I noticed that GHC generates slower code on an Linux amd64 bit platform than
the 32-bit version on a cheaper 32-bit machine.
CPUTime for running sieve of Erathostenes to generate 10,000 primes:
Athlon XP 2800
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 10:31:08AM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 17:51 +, Pedro Baltazar Vasconcelos wrote:
Athlon XP 2800 (32-bit): 7.98 secs
Athlon 64 3800 (64-bit): 10.29 secs
This is using GHC 6.6 on the 64-bit machine and 6.4.1 on the 32-bit one.
tphyahoo wrote:
Very, very helpful Chris; thanks; and thanks also to the many other helpful
haskellers.
They have (hopefully working) cabal files to make compiling and installing
ea\
sy.
Unfortunately, not so easy, for PCRE.regex. But hopefully this is just due
to my ignorance and
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Brian,
Thursday, January 4, 2007, 10:00:05 PM, you wrote:
deeper, the programmer is burdened more and more by the need to
cut-and-paste method definitions between instances because Haskell
doesn't allow a superclass (or ancestor class) method default to be
Brian Hurt wrote:
nth 0 (x:xs) = Some x
nth i (x:xs) = if i 0 then Empty else nth (i-1) xs
nth i [] = Empty
[blows stack on large i]
As other people have pointed out, this is due to laziness. I'd write it
like:
nth 0 (x:_) = Some x
nth i (_:xs) = of i 0 then Empty else (nth $! i-1)
Brian Hulley wrote:
Brian Hurt wrote:
nth 0 (x:xs) = Some x
nth i (x:xs) = if i 0 then Empty else nth (i-1) xs
nth i [] = Empty
[blows stack on large i]
As other people have pointed out, this is due to laziness. I'd write
it like:
nth 0 (x:_) = Some x
nth i (_:xs) = of i 0 then Empty
Brian Hulley wrote:
Brian Hulley wrote:
Brian Hurt wrote:
nth 0 (x:xs) = Some x
nth i (x:xs) = if i 0 then Empty else nth (i-1) xs
nth i [] = Empty
[blows stack on large i]
As other people have pointed out, this is due to laziness. I'd write
it like:
nth 0 (x:_) = Some x
nth i (_:xs)
On 06/01/07, Chris Kuklewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running --configure notices that many things are not installed, but this is just
noise from Cabal.
This is the second time I've seen someone get confused by these
messages. I propose we add a 'Configuration successful, now type
runhaskell
I'm having trouble installing ghc 6.6. On ubuntu, virtual server (user mode
linux).
Something seems to be killing the process, no idea why.
Anyone seen this?
I looked around with ps to see if anything looked suspicious. I do have a
lot of screens open, but I don't see why that should matter.
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 03:30:56PM -0800, tphyahoo wrote:
I'm having trouble installing ghc 6.6. On ubuntu, virtual server (user mode
linux).
Something seems to be killing the process, no idea why.
Anyone seen this?
xargs: /usr/bin/ar: terminated by signal 11
make[2]: ***
At Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:41:37 -0800,
Stefan O'Rear wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 03:30:56PM -0800, tphyahoo wrote:
I'm having trouble installing ghc 6.6. On ubuntu, virtual server (user mode
linux).
Is it repeatable? i.e. If you run 'make' again, do you get the same error at
the same
dmhouse:
On 06/01/07, Chris Kuklewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running --configure notices that many things are not installed, but this
is just
noise from Cabal.
This is the second time I've seen someone get confused by these
messages. I propose we add a 'Configuration successful, now
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:44:46PM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
dmhouse:
On 06/01/07, Chris Kuklewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running --configure notices that many things are not installed, but this
is just noise from Cabal.
This is the second time I've seen someone get
Donald Bruce Stewart writes:
dmhouse:
This is the second time I've seen someone get confused by these
messages. I propose we add a 'Configuration successful, now type
runhaskell Setup.hs build.' to the bottom of the configure output.
I agree. This issue is even mentioned here:
Em Dom, 2007-01-07 às 02:07 +, Ross Paterson escreveu:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:44:46PM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
dmhouse:
On 06/01/07, Chris Kuklewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running --configure notices that many things are not installed, but this
is just noise from
16 matches
Mail list logo
