On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 23:33 -0500, Galchin, Vasili wrote:
2) This strongly looks like the package database manager, i.e.
ghc-pkg. Source please so I can understand where this d*amn unknown
package: unix-2.3.0.0 message is coming from and why?
Yes, ghc/ghc-pkg is giving this message because
Good day hackers,
The Python community have been successful in standardizing an
interface between web server and applications or frameworks resulting
in users having more control over their web stack by being able to
pick frameworks independently from web servers, and vice versa. I
propose we try
Johan Tibell ha scritto:
Good day hackers,
The Python community have been successful in standardizing an
interface between web server and applications or frameworks resulting
in users having more control over their web stack by being able to
pick frameworks independently from web servers, and
On Apr 13, 2008, at 10:21 , Manlio Perillo wrote:
I'm not yet an Haskell expert, however one of the great feature of
WSGI is that the environ is a Python dictionary.
This means that the user can add new keys/values in it.
I'm using this feature, in my WSGI implementation for Nginx (and in
SDL works great on Windows, and you don't even need cygwin. Only ghc
is required. There are instructions in the WIN32 file.
http://darcs.haskell.org/~lemmih/hsSDL/hssdl/WIN32
2008/4/12 Conal Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now I have sdl-config, but still not able to build.
Does *anyone* have the
Thanks very much for the pointer, Bit.
I had to add \SDL to the end of this def:
Include-Dirs: C:\SDL-1.2.12\include
and I didn't need to change the Extra-Libraries line. I'm using cygwin,
which may make a difference here.
Next, I 'cabal install'ed SDL-ttf and discovered that I need the
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Johan Tibell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Using a different set of data types would work better.
Give that this is Haskell, I'd suggest more types ;)
HTTP headers aren't just strings and, at the risk of tooting my own
horn, I'll point to the Headers structure in
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:06:43 Adam Langley wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Johan Tibell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Using a different set of data types would work better.
Give that this is Haskell, I'd suggest more types ;)
HTTP headers aren't just strings and, at the risk of
In a sense, the CGIT interface provided by Network.CGI already is a
sort of halfway implementation of what we're discussing, no?
I'd be interested in approaching this from the other way --
specifying exactly what CGIT doesn't provide and therefore what folks
want to see. As far as I can
Haskell works fine with both the FastCGI and SCGI protocols (There are
libraries floating around for both), I have found them much nicer than
any mod_* web server plugin in general.
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
___
Haskell-Cafe
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does old code that handled these headers stop working, just because it
was looking in the other section, but now needs to check a field
dedicated to that header?
Yes, but it would be very sad if we couldn't do common
I am very interested in this work.
One thing missing is support for all HTTP methods, not just those
in RFC 2616. As-is, something like WebDAV cannot be implemented.
That probably means requestMethod should be a (Byte)String.
What about something like sendfile(2) available on some platforms?
Adam Langley wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Johan Tibell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Using a different set of data types would work better.
Give that this is Haskell, I'd suggest more types ;)
HTTP headers aren't just strings and, at the risk of tooting my own
horn, I'll point to
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:32:07 Chris Smith wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:06:43 -0700, Adam Langley wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Johan Tibell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Using a different set of data types would work better.
Give that this is Haskell, I'd suggest more types ;)
14 matches
Mail list logo
