Thanks, I'll check out Data and Typeable
--- On Thu, 10/1/09, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH allb...@ece.cmu.edu wrote:
From: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH allb...@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Introspection on types.
To: Gregory Propf gregorypr...@yahoo.com
Cc: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
Hey, first of all, in terms of a platform for promoting haskell
commercially, happstutorial.com actually implements a job board.
Yeah, it's primitive and not feature complete, but on hackage, open
source, and ready for anyone who would like to work on it. (Currently
maintained by creighton hogg.)
correction, happstutorial is now tutorial.happstack.com.
2009/10/2 Thomas Hartman tphya...@gmail.com:
Hey, first of all, in terms of a platform for promoting haskell
commercially, happstutorial.com actually implements a job board.
Yeah, it's primitive and not feature complete, but on hackage,
Yes, this is yet another SourceGraph announcement, this time for version
0.5.2.0 [1].
[1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/SourceGraph-0.5.2.0
The changes in this release are as follows:
* Shift overall analysis to the top and per-module analysis to the
end, as suggested by Duncan Coutts.
Haskell for closing the gap between specification and code
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:42 PM, ed...@ymonad.com wrote:
Hi,
I will give a seminar to physicists at USP (Universidade de São Paulo,
Brazil) university and they asked me for a good title, something that can
attract physicists.
On Oct 1, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Curt Sampson wrote:
And as far as something like dealing with a changing language and
libraries, the mainstream already has well-established and popular
techniques for doing just: agile development.
A project manager's worst nightmare:
Sorry boss, but we're just
2009/10/2 John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Curt Sampson wrote:
And as far as something like dealing with a changing language and
libraries, the mainstream already has well-established and popular
techniques for doing just: agile development.
A project manager's
On Oct 1, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Curt Sampson wrote:
The main whinging seems to be about libraries, of which we have only
1585 on hackage.
It's not just about the _number_ of libraries, but the _usefulness_ of
them for solving real-world problems. Haskell has a large number of
libraries that
I'm not saying Haskell is unstable. I'm saying that the attitude
expressed in the following quote is at odds with the needs of business:
And as far as something like dealing with a changing language and
libraries, the mainstream already has well-established and popular
techniques for
Sorry boss, but we're just not going to be able to meet that deadline,
because, well, a language extension we were using was dropped from the
language, and the syntax for some core operators was changed. Not only is
our code broken, but many of the libraries we were using are broken. Don't
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Yes, this is yet another SourceGraph announcement, this time for version
0.5.2.0 [1].
[1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/SourceGraph-0.5.2.0
installation went well, but I get a rather uninformative error message
for 505 source files:
cabal build:
[505
Hi,
there are numerous examples on how to implement a DSL, but I haven't been
able to figure out how to design one.
I mean I have a pretty good idea of the problem domain, I've coded it over
and over again until I got it right. Now I'd like to express that part as
a DSL instead of hard
Günther Schmidt wrote:
And that I find to be the really tricky part, how do I *design* a DSL?
My favorite approach is something like as described in these:
http://lukepalmer.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/semantic-design/
http://conal.net/papers/type-class-morphisms/
It takes a little bit of
Hi Edgar
No-one seems to have pointed you to the Maestro:
http://users.info.unicaen.fr/~karczma/arpap/
The quantum mechanics one might be the most directly useful, but they
are all great reads:
http://users.info.unicaen.fr/~karczma/arpap/hasiqm.pdf
Best wishes
Stephen
2009/9/30
Hong Yang wrote:
Good libraries are not enough for a language to go beyond mere existence.
There must exist good documents, i.e., good tutorials, good books, and
good explanations and examples in the libraries, etc, that are easy for
people to learn and use. In my humble opinion, Haskell has a
Fairly late to the party on this discussion, but this captured my attention:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Curt Sampson
c...@starling-software.comwrote:
This may be somewhat anecdotal evidence, but I disagree with both
of your statements here. I've rarely known anybody to use Java
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:54 AM, John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net wrote:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Curt Sampson wrote:
And as far as something like dealing with a changing language and
libraries, the mainstream already has well-established and popular
techniques for doing just: agile
Hey everyone,
I am thinking about creating a particular data structure with an
immutable and mutable version. The key of my problem is that I would
like the user to be able to work with a mutable version of the data
within a non-IO monad and then get an immutable value at the end,
Christian Maeder christian.mae...@dfki.de writes:
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
installation went well, but I get a rather uninformative error message
for 505 source files:
cabal build:
[505 of 505] Compiling Main
:o
There is no way that there's 505 source files in SourceGraph...
On Oct 2, 2009, at 18:46 , Edward Kmett wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:54 AM, John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net
wrote:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Curt Sampson wrote:
And as far as something like dealing with a changing language and
libraries, the mainstream already has well-established and
Sorry to reply to my own posting, but... AHA! I see now what's going
on. The purpose of the rank-2 qualifier is to prevent STRefs from
leaking outside of the runST call, and what the code does at the
lowest level is that it passes around a token state object to force
the compiler to
21 matches
Mail list logo
