Hello Community,
I am a student from the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, and at
the moment I am writing my bachelor thesis about "Post-Mass-Prodcution
Softwaresupply/ -development in case of an University administration".
This approach deals with student-driven software development in w
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be a good idea for the folks interested in
Haskell in Bangalore to get together. Especially if there are folks at EGL,
perhaps we could just meet up at pyramid.
I've been trying to learn Haskell for a while and currently am trying to
work through SPJ's "implementatio
selamat datang!
On Jun 18, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Jean-Denis Koeck wrote:
> Hi! I'm of Indonesian descent (by my mother) and I'll be there this summer.
> Nice to meet you!
>
> Jean-Denis
>
> 2010/6/15 vipex.id
> Hi, I'm new in Haskell & wondering is there Indonesian people using Haskell
> here.
>
On 20/06/2010 6:32 PM, Alexander Solla wrote:
in your example c will not be in scope in the expression (let b = c >>=
return . f) - that's the purpose of the recursive do construct (mdo, now
"do .. rec ..")
jvl
On Jun 20, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Alexander Solla wrote:
do a <- getChar
let b = c
On Sunday 20 June 2010 9:24:54 pm Alexander Solla wrote:
> Why can't you just use let notation do deal with the recursion? I
> thought "lets" in do blocks were just a little bit of syntactic sugar
> for "regular" let expressions, which do allow mutual recursion. I
> could be totally wrong though.
On Jun 20, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Alexander Solla wrote:
do a <- getChar
let b = c >>= return . f
let c = b >>= return . g
c >>= putChar
b
Correction: by your construction, f and g are already in the Kliesli
category, so you don't need the return compositions. I st
On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:18 AM, John Lask wrote:
do rec
a <- getChar
b <- f c
c <- g b
putChar c
return b
I don't particularly care that the only recursive statements are
#2,#3 - I just want my nice neat layout back. I have just spent an
inordinate amount of time updating cod
On 22 June 2010 03:18, John Lask wrote:
>
> I just want my nice neat layout back. I have just spent an inordinate amount
> of time updating code when if the parser recognised "do rec" as a recursive
> group it would have been a drop in replacement and taken me one tenth of the
> time.
>
> Why can'
Whilst I have nothing against the change in syntax for recursive do aka
http://old.nabble.com/Update-on-GHC-6.12.1-td26103595.html
Instead of writing
mdo
a <- getChar
b <- f c
c <- g b
putChar c
return b
you would write
do
a <- getChar
rec { b <- f c
Daniel Kahlenberg writes:
> Hi,
>
> when installing pandoc package, which has digest somewhere in
> dependencies the usual cabal install stucks because zlib.h is missing,
> so I explicitly installed zlib package first, then installing digest
> (can also replace that directly with pandoc here) wit
On 20/06/10 22:03, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 19/06/10 17:23, Yves Parès wrote:
It helps me understand better, but would you have some simple code
that would do that ?
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~koen/pubs/jfp99-monad.ps
Except that the paper I'm trying to refer to seems to have fallen off
t
On 19/06/10 17:23, Yves Parès wrote:
It helps me understand better, but would you have some simple code
that would do that ?
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~koen/pubs/jfp99-monad.ps
Paul.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://ww
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Yes, you are right, but now, "cabal install leksah" I get:
>
This one is a bummer, and I see it all the time when I try to build a
package linked against macports.
Here's the last thread about with, with more link
Hi again,
Yes, you are right, but now, "cabal install leksah" I get:
..
..
Linking dist/build/leksah-server/leksah-server ...
ld warning: atom sorting error for
_ghczm6zi12zi1_LibFFI_Czuffizucif_closure_tbl and
_ghczm6zi12zi1_LibFFI_Czuffizutype_closure_tbl in /Library/Frameworks/
GHC.frame
Hi,
when installing pandoc package, which has digest somewhere in
dependencies the usual cabal install stucks because zlib.h is missing,
so I explicitly installed zlib package first, then installing digest
(can also replace that directly with pandoc here) with the
--extra-include-dirs parameter se
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz
wrote:
> [1 of 2] Compiling Gtk2HsSetup (
> /var/folders/fA/fAGWxnQMEFCzPAHcFpbaMk+++TI/-Tmp-/glib-0.11.096835/glib-0.11.0/Gtk2HsSetup.hs,
> /var/folders/fA/fAGWxnQMEFCzPAHcFpbaMk+++TI/-Tmp-/glib-0.11.096835/glib-0.11.0/dist/setup/Gt
[1 of 2] Compiling Gtk2HsSetup ( /var/folders/fA/
fAGWxnQMEFCzPAHcFpbaMk+++TI/-Tmp-/glib-0.11.096835/glib-0.11.0/
Gtk2HsSetup.hs, /var/folders/fA/fAGWxnQMEFCzPAHcFpbaMk+++TI/-Tmp-/
glib-0.11.096835/glib-0.11.0/dist/setup/Gtk2HsSetup.o )
[2 of 2] Compiling Main ( /var/folders/fA/
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz
wrote:
> WTF!
>
> Sorry for the mistake in the title, is the problem of doing 124 different
> things at the same time :P
It looks like it is failing to install the 'glib' haskell package.
What do you see when you try:
cabal install glib
WTF!
Sorry for the mistake in the title, is the problem of doing 124
different things at the same time :P
El 20/06/2010, a las 16:28, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz escribió:
Hi all,
I would like to play a little with erlang.
I downloaded Haskell platform, ang ghc and ghci seems to work.
Try
Hi all,
I would like to play a little with erlang.
I downloaded Haskell platform, ang ghc and ghci seems to work. Trying
to install leksah, Cabal, gives me the following error.
http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform/ticket/110
I downloaded and installed Haskell Platform from source. Did..
(apologies if you receive multiple copies)
Dear all,
We have finalized the program for the third Ghent FPG Meeting on Tuesday, June
29 in the Technicum building of Ghent University (Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41,
9000 Gent) at 19h. As before, to enter the building, you should go to the
automatic
I love that. It's great. Definitely going in my .ghci file.
On 20 June 2010 12:28, Liam O'Connor wrote:
> swing map :: forall a b. [a -> b] -> a -> [b]
> swing any :: forall a. [a -> Bool] -> a -> Bool
> swing foldr :: forall a b. b -> a -> [a -> b -> b] -> b
> swing zipWith :: forall a b c. [a -
swing map :: forall a b. [a -> b] -> a -> [b]
swing any :: forall a. [a -> Bool] -> a -> Bool
swing foldr :: forall a b. b -> a -> [a -> b -> b] -> b
swing zipWith :: forall a b c. [a -> b -> c] -> a -> [b] -> [c]
swing find :: forall a. [a -> Bool] -> a -> Maybe (a -> Bool)
-- applies each of t
If you go this route, I will shamelessly promote hothasktags instead
of ghci. It generates proper tags for qualified imports.
What do you mean by "proper" here?
I think Luke means that if you use qualified names then hothasktags can
give you better location information than current ghci ctags
24 matches
Mail list logo