Dan Knapp dan...@gmail.com writes:
There is a legal distinction between static and dynamic linking,
Well, the obvious distinction is that a dynamically linked executable
doesn't actually contain any code from its libraries, while a statically
linked one does.
In particular, they assert that
On 9 February 2011 23:35, Dan Knapp dan...@gmail.com wrote:
[SNIP]
I believe this means that if we have a
package named hs-save-the-whales that is under the GPL, and a
front-end package hs-redeem-them-for-valuable-cash-prizes which
makes use of the functionality in hs-save-the-whales, the
Also, is there any news yet on a procedure for community members with
accounts on projects.haskell.org to get access to them again? My ssh
publickey login is no longer being accepted. I had an account mainly
for hosting the darcs repo and the website for my project
grammar-combinators. The website
On 10 February 2011 20:03, Dominique Devriese
dominique.devri...@cs.kuleuven.be wrote:
Also, is there any news yet on a procedure for community members with
accounts on projects.haskell.org to get access to them again? My ssh
publickey login is no longer being accepted. I had an account mainly
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 03:47 +1300, Vivian McPhail wrote:
license: Foo, Bar
Could this be computed automatically from the source files by Cabal?
I would not want to rely on that.
Looking specifically at hmatrix, there are three kinds of modules
i) bindings to GSLGPL
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 18:35 -0500, Dan Knapp wrote:
I haven't heard anyone mention this yet, and it's a biggie, so I
guess I'd better de-lurk and explain it. The issue is this: There is
a legal distinction between static and dynamic linking, or at least
some licenses (the GPL is the one I'm
On 10.02.11 12:12, Duncan Coutts wrote:
We are already working on a feature that will show the full set of
licenses that the end user must comply with (a patch has been submitted
and it's been through one round of review so far). In your example that
would mean you expect the set to be {BSD}
Well, that was probably the main problem :-(
Unfortunately, even if, after performing all the stuff once again, I
made platform configured, make ended in compilation of happy with old
story:
Configuring happy-1.18.5...
./Setup build
Preprocessing executables for happy-1.18.5...
Building
A while ago I remember someone showing me some tool, I *think* ghci that
allowed you to pass it a function of type String - String as an input, and
have it simply run that function on stdin (presumably using interact) to
achieve useful things like this...
$ cat myFile.txt | ghci -e 'unlines .
Possibly HSH[1]?
[1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/HSH-2.0.3
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
A while ago I remember someone showing me some tool, I *think* ghci that
allowed you to pass it a function of type String - String as an input, and
have
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:00 +1300, Vivian McPhail wrote:
It seems then that a package should be the least restrictive
combination of all the licenses in all the contained modules.
Omit the words least restrictive and I think you are correct.
To combine licences, just aggregate them.
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 12:44 +0100, Stefan Kersten wrote:
On 10.02.11 12:12, Duncan Coutts wrote:
We are already working on a feature that will show the full set of
licenses that the end user must comply with (a patch has been submitted
and it's been through one round of review so far). In
Specs:
- cabal-install 0.8.2
- Cabal 1.8.0.6
- GHC 6.12.3
- Mac OS X 10.6.6
- MacBook Pro 5,1
$ cabal upgrade missingh
Resolving dependencies...
Configuring regex-base-0.93.2...
Preprocessing library regex-base-0.93.2...
Building regex-base-0.93.2...
[1 of 4] Compiling
Am 10.02.2011 13:15, schrieb Dušan Kolář:
Well, that was probably the main problem :-(
Unfortunately, even if, after performing all the stuff once again, I
made platform configured, make ended in compilation of happy with old
story:
Configuring happy-1.18.5...
./Setup build
I have the following ghc script:
cat ghc
#!/bin/sh
exedir=/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.12i386/lib/ghc-6.12.3
exeprog=ghc-stage2
executablename=$exedir/$exeprog
datadir=/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.12i386/share
bindir=/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.12i386/bin
topdir=/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.12i386/lib/ghc-6.12.3
Maybe the Zord64_HARD.lhs is at fault for not using qualified module
names? I can't see why this would be the case though, but at look at
the source shows it doesn't.
In future, please could you put some information about your problem **
at the top ** of your message rather than burying it many
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:59 +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
I disagree - the linked executable must, but not the wrapper by itself.
It's source code, i.e. text, thus a creative work, and therefore
covered by copyright - on its own.
You're certainly right from a legal standpoint. But being right
Well, happy lists CPP as extensions so maybe adding:
-pgmP $pgmgcc -E -undef -traditional
helps.
C.
Am 10.02.2011 16:53, schrieb Dušan Kolář:
I have the following ghc script:
cat ghc
#!/bin/sh
exedir=/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.12i386/lib/ghc-6.12.3
exeprog=ghc-stage2
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Chris Smith cdsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:59 +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
I disagree - the linked executable must, but not the wrapper by itself.
It's source code, i.e. text, thus a creative work, and therefore
covered by copyright - on its
It looks a bit suspicious that the haskell98 module is installed in
your user-level package database. Maybe that's okay, but I wouldn't
try it myself.
Do you know how that happened? What does `ghc-pkg list --user` show?
Antoine
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Andrew Pennebaker
On 10 Feb 2011, at 17:38, Antoine Latter wrote:
So no, the instant of compilation is not when the transitive
dependencies kick in, it is the publication of compiled binaries,
which in my mind is a pretty specialized case.
This is possibly the most important point to emphasise, of which many
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:44, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
A while ago I remember someone showing me some tool, I *think* ghci that
allowed you to pass it a function of type String - String as an input, and
have it simply run that function on stdin (presumably using interact) to
Hi,
I noticed that even though I declare the type of a function in my code as
Data.ByteString.Lazy.ByteString ... when I check it out in ghci using :t, it
shows this - Data.ByteString.Lazy.Internal.ByteString
Is this expected?
Regards,
Kashyap
___
ckkashyap:
Hi,
I noticed that even though I declare the type of a function in my code as�
Data.ByteString.Lazy.ByteString ... when I check it out in ghci using :t,
it shows this -�Data.ByteString.Lazy.Internal.ByteString
Is this expected?
Yep, the 'Internal' module is where
Yep, the 'Internal' module is where the type is defined, and then
re-exported through the regular module.
Thanks Don ... good to know.
Regards,
Kashyap
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:18 PM, Gwern Branwen wrote:
2 years ago in February 2009, I wrote up a history of Summers of Code
through 2008
(http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2009-February/055489.html).
But the Wheel turns, and years come and pass, leaving memories that
fade into 404s;
HList programming -- as programming with too revealing type systems in
general -- is quite tedious. Since the type of an HList value reveals
its structure, including the number of the elements and their
sequence, we often have to write an HList algorithm twice. We have to
program the operation on
On 2/7/11 9:42 AM, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
To combine licences, just aggregate them. There is no lattice of
subsumption; no more or less restrictive ordering. It's simple: you
must obey all of them.
In the event that my comments on the previous thread were a source of
confusion, I agree with
On 2/8/11 6:00 AM, Ketil Malde wrote:
This does seem a bit excessive. As a start, I don't remember anyone
asking for control over (un)boxedness, so hopefully we could jettison
that part of it?
Uh, you mean like in IOUArrays, the UNPACK pragma, or
-funbox-strict-fields? Unboxing is an
29 matches
Mail list logo
