I've just uploaded a new version of syntactic:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/syntactic
The most important change is that I've added observable sharing based on
StableNames. The implementation and interface are conceptually quite
similar to Andy Gill's data-reify.
The library offers
+1 - does anyone know the answer to this?
On Jul 27, 2011 2:04 PM, Chris Smith cdsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 07:20 -0400, Jack Henahan wrote:
Bundling things with the HP is just going to bloat that download
and confuse new users more (and my god, the dep-chasing... the
number
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Tom Murphy amin...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 - does anyone know the answer to this?
On Jul 27, 2011 2:04 PM, Chris Smith cdsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 07:20 -0400, Jack Henahan wrote:
Bundling things with the HP is just going to bloat that download
I have a question about the following GHCi interaction:
Prelude let x = 23
Prelude :show bindings
x :: Integer = _
What is the meaning of the underscore in the third line? Why doesn't it say
this, instead?
x :: Integer = 23
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 14:43, Paul Reiners paul.rein...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a question about the following GHCi interaction:
Prelude let x = 23
Prelude :show bindings
x :: Integer = _
What is the meaning of the underscore in the third line? Why doesn't it
say this, instead?
The
It hasn't been evaluated yet. It is just a thunk.
let x = 23
:show bindings
x :: Integer = _
x
23
:show bindings
x :: Integer = 23
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Paul Reiners paul.rein...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a question about the following GHCi interaction:
Prelude let x = 23
Prelude
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Paul Reiners wrote:
I have a question about the following GHCi interaction:
Prelude let x = 23
Prelude :show bindings
x :: Integer = _
What is the meaning of the underscore in the third line? Why doesn't it say
this, instead?
x :: Integer = 23
I have never used
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 14:52, Henning Thielemann
lemm...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
I have never used ':show bindings' before ... in other cases like
let x='a'
and
let x=23::Int
Since you gave explicit types, x is bound to strict values directly; it's
only when no type is given that
On Thursday 28 July 2011, 20:43:30, Paul Reiners wrote:
I have a question about the following GHCi interaction:
Prelude let x = 23
Prelude :show bindings
x :: Integer = _
What is the meaning of the underscore in the third line? Why doesn't it
say this, instead?
x :: Integer = 23
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 14:52, Henning Thielemann
lemm...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
I have never used ':show bindings' before ... in other cases like
let x='a'
and
let x=23::Int
Since you gave explicit types, x is bound to strict values
Another fun example:
let c = 0 : c
let b = 1 : 1 : c
:show bindings
length (take 5 c)
:show bindings
take 3 c
:show bindings
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Dear Haskellians,
No desire to spam, but some folks on this list might find this of interest.
Best wishes,
--greg
Biosimilarity LLC is looking for a the next Merlin! We need an artiste with
a certain taste and technical instinct that have attracted them to next
generation functional
Your question is insightful. The posted answers are
excellent. I merely wish to illustrate one, already made, point on a
concrete example.
The complete code is in the file
http://okmij.org/ftp/Haskell/Iteratee/IterDemo.hs
The file implements a series of progressively more complex
13 matches
Mail list logo
